Bertie, aka [email protected]

[a[_3_]]

Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that @aa.aa as the
return email address. If you look at information on google groups
you'll find that address has been banned for "violating terms of
agreement" earlier this month so it would appear Bertie has changed
email/signon information.

What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the worst
offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in the business
of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for us.

Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity does not.

[Mick[_2_]]

"a" > wrote in message
...
| Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that @aa.aa as the
| return email address. If you look at information on google groups
| you'll find that address has been banned for "violating terms of
| agreement" earlier this month so it would appear Bertie has changed
| email/signon information.
|
| What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the worst
| offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in the business
| of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for us.
|
| Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity does not.

We can only hope.

But Burtie has been changing a couple times a month for quite some time now.

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
|a > wrote in news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-8de5-bec42f653826
| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
|
| > Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that @aa.aa as the
| > return email address. If you look at information on google groups
| > you'll find that address has been banned for "violating terms of
| > agreement" earlier this month so it would appear Bertie has changed
| > email/signon information.
| >
|
| Nope. Haven;t changed anything.
|
|
| > What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the worst
| > offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in the business
| > of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for us.
|
|
|
| Google don't run usenet, they're only a window into it.
|
|
|
| >
| > Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity does not.
|
|
|
| Well, the e-mail addie ban has nothing to do with me, but some spammer
| who used it also. doesn't matter a damn to me.
| I'll change it if it makes you happy though!
|
|
|
|
| Bertie
| >
|

Nice that you don't discriminate, you lie to everyone.

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "a" > wrote in message
| > .
| > ..
| >| Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that @aa.aa as the
| >| return email address. If you look at information on google groups
| >| you'll find that address has been banned for "violating terms of
| >| agreement" earlier this month so it would appear Bertie has changed
| >| email/signon information.
| >|
| >| What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the worst
| >| offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in the business
| >| of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for us.
| >|
| >| Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity does not.
| >
| > We can only hope.
|
|
| Whooosh!
|
|
| Do you even feel it when you walk into these things, Okie?
| >
| > But Burtie has been changing a couple times a month for quite some
| > time now.
| >
|
|
| No, bertie hasn't you fjukkktard.
|
|
|
| Bertie

Yes, you have, you do, you will, you want.

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > ...
| >|a > wrote in news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-8de5-
| bec42f653826
| >| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
| >|
| >| > Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that @aa.aa as the
| >| > return email address. If you look at information on google groups
| >| > you'll find that address has been banned for "violating terms of
| >| > agreement" earlier this month so it would appear Bertie has changed
| >| > email/signon information.
| >| >
| >|
| >| Nope. Haven;t changed anything.
| >|
| >|
| >| > What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the worst
| >| > offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in the
| business
| >| > of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for us.
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Google don't run usenet, they're only a window into it.
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| >
| >| > Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity does not.
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Well, the e-mail addie ban has nothing to do with me, but some
| spammer
| >| who used it also. doesn't matter a damn to me.
| >| I'll change it if it makes you happy though!
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >| >
| >|
| >
| > Nice that you don't discriminate, you lie to everyone.
| >
|
| Nope.
|
|
| Bertie

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > ...
| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "a" > wrote in message
| >| > news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-8de5-bec42f653826
| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.c
| >| > om. ..
| >| >| Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that @aa.aa as
| >| >| the return email address. If you look at information on google
| >| >| groups you'll find that address has been banned for "violating
| >| >| terms of agreement" earlier this month so it would appear Bertie
| >| >| has changed email/signon information.
| >| >|
| >| >| What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the worst
| >| >| offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in the
| >| >| business of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for us.
| >| >|
| >| >| Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity does
| >| >| not.
| >| >
| >| > We can only hope.
| >|
| >|
| >| Whooosh!
| >|
| >|
| >| Do you even feel it when you walk into these things, Okie?
| >| >
| >| > But Burtie has been changing a couple times a month for quite some
| >| > time now.
| >| >
| >|
| >|
| >| No, bertie hasn't you fjukkktard.
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >
| > Yes, you have, you do, you will, you want.
| >
|
|
| Prove it.
|
|
|
| Bertie
| >
| >
|

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > .. .
| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| > ...
| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:PeRAk.10737$Il.7147
| @newsfe09.iad:
| >| >|
| >| >| >
| >| >| > "a" > wrote in message
| >| >| > news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-8de5-bec42f653826
| >| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.c
| >| >| > om. ..
| >| >| >| Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that @aa.aa as
| >| >| >| the return email address. If you look at information on google
| >| >| >| groups you'll find that address has been banned for "violating
| >| >| >| terms of agreement" earlier this month so it would appear
| Bertie
| >| >| >| has changed email/signon information.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the
| worst
| >| >| >| offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in the
| >| >| >| business of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for
| us.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity does
| >| >| >| not.
| >| >| >
| >| >| > We can only hope.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Whooosh!
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Do you even feel it when you walk into these things, Okie?
| >| >| >
| >| >| > But Burtie has been changing a couple times a month for quite
| some
| >| >| > time now.
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| No, bertie hasn't you fjukkktard.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Bertie
| >| >
| >| > Yes, you have, you do, you will, you want.
| >| >
| >|
| >|
| >| Prove it.
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >
| >
| >
|
| Can't.
|
|
| Can you?
|
|
| Bertie

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > .. .
| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:tFSAk.19854$PK.18490
| @newsfe04.iad:
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| > ...
| >| >|a > wrote in news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-8de5-
| >| bec42f653826
| >| >| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
| >| >|
| >| >| > Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that @aa.aa as
| the
| >| >| > return email address. If you look at information on google
| groups
| >| >| > you'll find that address has been banned for "violating terms of
| >| >| > agreement" earlier this month so it would appear Bertie has
| changed
| >| >| > email/signon information.
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >| Nope. Haven;t changed anything.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| > What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the worst
| >| >| > offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in the
| >| business
| >| >| > of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for us.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Google don't run usenet, they're only a window into it.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| >
| >| >| > Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity does
| not.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Well, the e-mail addie ban has nothing to do with me, but some
| >| spammer
| >| >| who used it also. doesn't matter a damn to me.
| >| >| I'll change it if it makes you happy though!
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >
| >| > Nice that you don't discriminate, you lie to everyone.
| >| >
| >|
| >| Nope.
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >
| >
| >
|
| Nothig to say, liar boi?
|
|
| Bertie

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > .. .
| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| > .. .
| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:RGSAk.19878$PK.2257
| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >|
| >| >| >
| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| >| > ...
| >| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:PeRAk.10737$Il.7147
| >| @newsfe09.iad:
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| > "a" > wrote in message
| >| >| >| > news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-8de5-bec42f653826
| >| >| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.c
| >| >| >| > om. ..
| >| >| >| >| Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that @aa.aa
| as
| >| >| >| >| the return email address. If you look at information on
| google
| >| >| >| >| groups you'll find that address has been banned for
| "violating
| >| >| >| >| terms of agreement" earlier this month so it would appear
| >| Bertie
| >| >| >| >| has changed email/signon information.
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the
| >| worst
| >| >| >| >| offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in the
| >| >| >| >| business of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for
| >| us.
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity
| does
| >| >| >| >| not.
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| > We can only hope.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Whooosh!
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Do you even feel it when you walk into these things, Okie?
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| > But Burtie has been changing a couple times a month for quite
| >| some
| >| >| >| > time now.
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| No, bertie hasn't you fjukkktard.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >
| >| >| > Yes, you have, you do, you will, you want.
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Prove it.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >| Can't.
| >|
| >|
| >| Can you?
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >
| >
| >
|
| Thought so.
|
|
| Bertie

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > .. .
| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:JaTAk.20393$PK.14904
| @newsfe04.iad:
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| > .. .
| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:JQSAk.20051$PK.847
| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >|
| >| >| >
| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| >| > .. .
| >| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:RGSAk.19878$PK.2257
| >| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| >| >| > ...
| >| >| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:PeRAk.10737$Il.7147
| >| >| @newsfe09.iad:
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| > "a" > wrote in message
| >| >| >| >| > news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-8de5-bec42f653826
| >| >| >| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.c
| >| >| >| >| > om. ..
| >| >| >| >| >| Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that
| @aa.aa
| >| as
| >| >| >| >| >| the return email address. If you look at information on
| >| google
| >| >| >| >| >| groups you'll find that address has been banned for
| >| "violating
| >| >| >| >| >| terms of agreement" earlier this month so it would appear
| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >| >| >| has changed email/signon information.
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as
| the
| >| >| worst
| >| >| >| >| >| offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in
| the
| >| >| >| >| >| business of banning pains in the asses there may be hope
| for
| >| >| us.
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity
| >| does
| >| >| >| >| >| not.
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| > We can only hope.
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Whooosh!
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Do you even feel it when you walk into these things, Okie?
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| > But Burtie has been changing a couple times a month for
| quite
| >| >| some
| >| >| >| >| > time now.
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| No, bertie hasn't you fjukkktard.
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| > Yes, you have, you do, you will, you want.
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Prove it.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >
| >| >| >
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >| Can't.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Can you?
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Bertie
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >| Thought so.
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|

[Watson[_3_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > ...
| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| > .. .
| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:JaTAk.20393$PK.14904
| >| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >|
| >| >| >
| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| >| > .. .
| >| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:JQSAk.20051$PK.847
| >| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| >| >| > .. .
| >| >| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:RGSAk.19878$PK.2257
| >| >| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| >| >| >| > ...
| >| >| >| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:PeRAk.10737$Il.7147
| >| >| >| @newsfe09.iad:
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| >| > "a" > wrote in message
| >| >| >| >| >| > news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-8de5-bec42f653826
| >| >| >| >| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.c
| >| >| >| >| >| > om. ..
| >| >| >| >| >| >| Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that
| >| @aa.aa
| >| >| as
| >| >| >| >| >| >| the return email address. If you look at information
| on
| >| >| google
| >| >| >| >| >| >| groups you'll find that address has been banned for
| >| >| "violating
| >| >| >| >| >| >| terms of agreement" earlier this month so it would
| appear
| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >| >| >| >| has changed email/signon information.
| >| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| >| What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as
| >| the
| >| >| >| worst
| >| >| >| >| >| >| offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is
| in
| >| the
| >| >| >| >| >| >| business of banning pains in the asses there may be
| hope
| >| for
| >| >| >| us.
| >| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| >| Too bad technical violations seem to count, and
| stupidity
| >| >| does
| >| >| >| >| >| >| not.
| >| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| >| > We can only hope.
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| Whooosh!
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| Do you even feel it when you walk into these things,
| Okie?
| >| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| >| > But Burtie has been changing a couple times a month for
| >| quite
| >| >| >| some
| >| >| >| >| >| > time now.
| >| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| No, bertie hasn't you fjukkktard.
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| > Yes, you have, you do, you will, you want.
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Prove it.
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Can't.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Can you?
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >
| >| >| >
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >| Thought so.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Bertie
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >
| >
| >
|
| God you're dummm.
|
|
|
| bertie

[george]

On Sep 21, 7:55*am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:

> *Real dummm
>
Hey Bertie who's your imitator?
Nothing more flattering than imitation they say

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
| >
|
| God you're dummm.
|
|
|
| bertie

You're the genus answer empty replies, anal boi.

[Mick[_2_]]

"george" > wrote in message
...
On Sep 21, 7:55 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:

> Real dummm
>
Hey Bertie who's your imitator?
Nothing more flattering than imitation they say
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

He is just avoiding the google searches. Ever see how much **** he post
every month.

Makes Anthony look extremely lame, even on his best month.

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
| george > wrote in
news:9984a551-0141-4524-9bb1-caeb23215883
| @s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
|
| > On Sep 21, 7:55 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
| >
| >> Real dummm
| >>
| > Hey Bertie who's your imitator?
| > Nothing more flattering than imitation they say
| >
| >
|
| Uh,, I suppose.
|
|
| Bertie

Uh,, you dumb ass.

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > .. .
| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| > .. .
| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:tFSAk.19854$PK.18490
| >| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >|
| >| >| >
| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| >| > ...
| >| >| >|a > wrote in news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-8de5-
| >| >| bec42f653826
| >| >| >| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| > Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that @aa.aa
| as
| >| the
| >| >| >| > return email address. If you look at information on google
| >| groups
| >| >| >| > you'll find that address has been banned for "violating terms
| of
| >| >| >| > agreement" earlier this month so it would appear Bertie has
| >| changed
| >| >| >| > email/signon information.
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Nope. Haven;t changed anything.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| > What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the
| worst
| >| >| >| > offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in the
| >| >| business
| >| >| >| > of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for us.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Google don't run usenet, they're only a window into it.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| > Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity
| does
| >| not.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Well, the e-mail addie ban has nothing to do with me, but some
| >| >| spammer
| >| >| >| who used it also. doesn't matter a damn to me.
| >| >| >| I'll change it if it makes you happy though!
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >
| >| >| > Nice that you don't discriminate, you lie to everyone.
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >| Nope.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Bertie
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >| Nothig to say, liar boi?
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >
| >
| >
|
| v
|
|

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > ...
| >| george > wrote in
| > news:9984a551-0141-4524-9bb1-caeb23215883
| >| @s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
| >|
| >| > On Sep 21, 7:55 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
| >| >
| >| >> Real dummm
| >| >>
| >| > Hey Bertie who's your imitator?
| >| > Nothing more flattering than imitation they say
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >| Uh,, I suppose.
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >
| > Uh,, you dumb ass.
| >
| >
| >
|
|
| Yeh, sure I am k00kieboi.
|
|
| Bertie

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > ...
| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in :
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| > .. .
| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:zQSAk.20048$PK.1521
| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >|
| >| >| >
| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| >| > .. .
| >| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:tFSAk.19854$PK.18490
| >| >| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| >| >| > ...
| >| >| >| >|a > wrote in news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-8de5-
| >| >| >| bec42f653826
| >| >| >| >| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| > Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that
| @aa.aa
| >| as
| >| >| the
| >| >| >| >| > return email address. If you look at information on google
| >| >| groups
| >| >| >| >| > you'll find that address has been banned for "violating
| terms
| >| of
| >| >| >| >| > agreement" earlier this month so it would appear Bertie
| has
| >| >| changed
| >| >| >| >| > email/signon information.
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Nope. Haven;t changed anything.
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| > What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as the
| >| worst
| >| >| >| >| > offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is in
| the
| >| >| >| business
| >| >| >| >| > of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for us.
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Google don't run usenet, they're only a window into it.
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| > Too bad technical violations seem to count, and stupidity
| >| does
| >| >| not.
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Well, the e-mail addie ban has nothing to do with me, but
| some
| >| >| >| spammer
| >| >| >| >| who used it also. doesn't matter a damn to me.
| >| >| >| >| I'll change it if it makes you happy though!
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| > Nice that you don't discriminate, you lie to everyone.
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Nope.
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >
| >| >| >
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >| Nothig to say, liar boi?
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Bertie
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >| v
| >|
| >|
| >
| >
| >
|
| Thougth so.
|
|
|
| Bertie

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "george" > wrote in message
| > ..
| > . On Sep 21, 7:55 am, Bertie the Bunyip > wrote:
| >
| >> Real dummm
| >>
| > Hey Bertie who's your imitator?
| > Nothing more flattering than imitation they say
| > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| > -------
| >
| > He is just avoiding the google searches. Ever see how much **** he
| > post every month.
| >
| > Makes Anthony look extremely lame, even on his best month.
| >
| >
| >
| >
|
| Yeh, OK paranoid boi.
|
|
|
| Bertie

Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean we are not all out to get you.

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
.. .
| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > .. .
| >| >
| >|
| >| God you're dummm.
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| bertie
| >
| > You're the genus answer empty replies, anal boi.
| >
| >
| >
|
| Moi?
|
| Never. I'm merely adding educational material.
|
|
| If you disagree, you should komplain to my server. They'll toss me if
| you're right....
|
|
|
|
| Bertie

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > .. .
| >| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in news:0CFBk.28733$rV4.21897
| @newsfe03.iad:
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| > ...
| >| >| george > wrote in
| >| > news:9984a551-0141-4524-9bb1-caeb23215883
| >| >| @s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
| >| >|
| >| >| > On Sep 21, 7:55 am, Bertie the Bunyip >
| wrote:
| >| >| >
| >| >| >> Real dummm
| >| >| >>
| >| >| > Hey Bertie who's your imitator?
| >| >| > Nothing more flattering than imitation they say
| >| >| >
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >| Uh,, I suppose.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| Bertie
| >| >
| >| > Uh,, you dumb ass.
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >|
| >| Yeh, sure I am k00kieboi.
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
|

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > .. .
| >| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in
| >| :
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "george" > wrote in message
| >| > news:9984a551-0141-4524-9bb1-caeb23215883
| @s9g2000prg.googlegroups.co
| >| > m.. . On Sep 21, 7:55 am, Bertie the Bunyip >
| >| > wrote:
| >| >
| >| >> Real dummm
| >| >>
| >| > Hey Bertie who's your imitator?
| >| > Nothing more flattering than imitation they say
| >| >
| --------------------------------------------------------------------
| >| > --- -------
| >| >
| >| > He is just avoiding the google searches. Ever see how much **** he
| >| > post every month.
| >| >
| >| > Makes Anthony look extremely lame, even on his best month.
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >| Yeh, OK paranoid boi.
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >
| > Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean we are not all out to get
| > you.
| >
|
| God you're a lametard
|
|
|
| Bertie

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > .. .
| >| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in news:0AFBk.28731$rV4.23550
| @newsfe03.iad:
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| > .. .
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >| God you're dummm.
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >| bertie
| >| >
| >| > You're the genus answer empty replies, anal boi.
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >| Moi?
| >|
| >| Never. I'm merely adding educational material.
| >|
| >|
| >| If you disagree, you should komplain to my server. They'll toss me if
| >| you're right....
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
|
| zx
| z
| x
|
|
|
|
|
| e
|
|
|
| e
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| e
|
|
|
|
|
|
| t
|
|
|
| 5
|
| 6
|
|
|
|
| 9
|
|
| 0
|
|
| p
|
|
| l
|
|
| ,
|
|
| m
|
| h
|
|
|
|
| g
|
| t
| f
|
| f
|
| t
|
|
|
|
|

[Mick[_2_]]

"Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
...
| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in :
|
| >
| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| > ...
| >| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in news:qCFBk.28734$rV4.4496
| @newsfe03.iad:
| >|
| >| >
| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| > ...
| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:SaTAk.20397$PK.3265
| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >|
| >| >| >
| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| >| > .. .
| >| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:zQSAk.20048$PK.1521
| >| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in
| message
| >| >| >| > .. .
| >| >| >| >| "Mick" <@_#`~#@.^net> wrote in news:tFSAk.19854$PK.18490
| >| >| >| @newsfe04.iad:
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
| >| >| >| >| > ...
| >| >| >| >| >|a > wrote in news:9ff6df0a-1513-45a8-
| 8de5-
| >| >| >| >| bec42f653826
| >| >| >| >| >| @e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| > Just noticed something, guys. Bertie used to use that
| >| @aa.aa
| >| >| as
| >| >| >| the
| >| >| >| >| >| > return email address. If you look at information on
| google
| >| >| >| groups
| >| >| >| >| >| > you'll find that address has been banned for "violating
| >| terms
| >| >| of
| >| >| >| >| >| > agreement" earlier this month so it would appear Bertie
| >| has
| >| >| >| changed
| >| >| >| >| >| > email/signon information.
| >| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| Nope. Haven;t changed anything.
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| > What's interesting to me is I'd not have viewed him as
| the
| >| >| worst
| >| >| >| >| >| > offender of the spirit of the newsgroup: if Google is
| in
| >| the
| >| >| >| >| business
| >| >| >| >| >| > of banning pains in the asses there may be hope for us.
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| Google don't run usenet, they're only a window into it.
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| >| > Too bad technical violations seem to count, and
| stupidity
| >| >| does
| >| >| >| not.
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| Well, the e-mail addie ban has nothing to do with me, but
| >| some
| >| >| >| >| spammer
| >| >| >| >| >| who used it also. doesn't matter a damn to me.
| >| >| >| >| >| I'll change it if it makes you happy though!
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >| > Nice that you don't discriminate, you lie to everyone.
| >| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Nope.
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >| >
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Nothig to say, liar boi?
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >|
| >| >| >| Bertie
| >| >| >
| >| >| >
| >| >| >
| >| >|
| >| >| v
| >| >|
| >| >|
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >
| >|
| >| Thougth so.
| >|
| >|
| >|
| >| Bertie
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|
|

[Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]]

"Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in :

>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
> ...
>| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in :
>|
>| >
>| > "Bertie the Bunyip" > wrote in message
>| > .. .
>| >| "Mick" <#$$#@%%%.^^^> wrote in
>| >| :
>| >|
>| >| >
>| >| > "george" > wrote in message
>| >| > news:9984a551-0141-4524-9bb1-caeb23215883
>| @s9g2000prg.googlegroups.co
>| >| > m.. . On Sep 21, 7:55 am, Bertie the Bunyip <B...
@BB.not.aaaaaaa>
>| >| > wrote:
>| >| >
>| >| >> Real dummm
>| >| >>
>| >| > Hey Bertie who's your imitator?
>| >| > Nothing more flattering than imitation they say
>| >| >
>| --------------------------------------------------------------------
>| >| > --- -------
>| >| >
>| >| > He is just avoiding the google searches. Ever see how much ****
he
>| >| > post every month.
>| >| >
>| >| > Makes Anthony look extremely lame, even on his best month.
>| >| >
>| >| >
>| >| >
>| >| >
>| >|
>| >| Yeh, OK paranoid boi.
>| >|
>| >|
>| >|
>| >| Bertie
>| >
>| > Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean we are not all out to
get
>| > you.
>| >
>|
>| God you're a lametard
>|
>|
>|
>| Bertie
>
>
>