Identify please - "Aircraft.jpg" 203.8 kBytes yEnc

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

I like the effect on the clouds through all that heat.

Identification please.....
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

Heard on a public transportation vehicle while in Orlando:
"When you exit this vehicle, please be sure to lower your head and watch your step."
"If you fail to do so, please lower your voice and watch your language."

[John Szalay]

Peter Hucker > wrote in
:

> I like the effect on the clouds through all that heat.
>
> Identification please.....


Lockheed-Martin F-16 with wingtip smoke generators.

judging by the paint, not a US model.

[John Szalay]

Peter Hucker > wrote in
:

> I like the effect on the clouds through all that heat.
>
> Identification please.....

F-16 of the Royal Netherlands Air Force


By playing with the color and contrast you, can make out
the RNAF Roundel on the right wing..
also the "bullseye" paint scheme on the leading edges and
horizontal stabilizer

[Dave Moorman]

In article >,
John Szalay > wrote:

> Peter Hucker > wrote in
> :
>
> > I like the effect on the clouds through all that heat.
> >
> > Identification please.....
>
> F-16 of the Royal Netherlands Air Force
>
>
> By playing with the color and contrast you, can make out
> the RNAF Roundel on the right wing..
> also the "bullseye" paint scheme on the leading edges and
> horizontal stabilizer

Looks like it's just taken off, what with the wheels partly retracted.

[BoilerBill]

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:18:08 -0400, "SKUNK WORKS" >
wrote:

>in code no less

Snip bliant demonstration of the posters stupidity and lack of usenet
ability

Keith

[Aegris]

"Peter Hucker" > kirjoitti
om...
>I like the effect on the clouds through all that heat.
>
> Identification please.....
> --
> http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com
> http://www.petersphotos.com

This part:

))=J*:tpsp*++++V+V**)*m*/-...-/...///0162111195536;9<<;9;;=}@FA=}>D?;;BKBDGGIII=}ALNLHNFHIH)*m+///1018228H>;>HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH)ê*;21?4×-+L*,;+-;+)î*I**+/++++++********+,-./012345)î*ß:*,+--,.-//..**+§+,-*.;/<K[k0=}{<1L>>\

Looked liked japanese, but the following made me think twice:

{q¤"*/BÎÏÊ<¼´R5/I·>zK¥{´cÍÎ+´RÊ'RFz+GeúJÌÀ¶$}B¾|´eú,{ï>â
ÊlO´SoJlz'ÌÂ,8'GRf{=@º2d|ûpgR*̽´{#ûs4/0*ïZ4R̪úRÌ´0>zRÊkusuÄ*kï>{r-ß>Þ¾êRoY"*t]o>6?ì´tR*Ï>ªûj¯ÍH¾¾|B4RÌÂ/1ÙÏ>|=}@¹ð´[v.Ï
´t*R
Á^4*tRo*>{o*Y>¾{j0RÌ´*RÌ´*R÷CÍ´*Rʶûj/GÒ̪4R̪4R̪4RÌ«1"1ý´Rj/OW-Pª=}^Ì*ïG'*ù>¾{j/>¡Íç*1o>z*düûü¶ú+oBÍFúZïQt{r§R:Þ�ºD?ÈÞ*É¿

I'm defintely sure, it's Chinese aircraft.

You should send us more data to analyze.

[John Szalay]

Dave Moorman > wrote in news:nobody-
:
>> F-16 of the Royal Netherlands Air Force
>>
>>
>> By playing with the color and contrast you, can make out
>> the RNAF Roundel on the right wing..
>> also the "bullseye" paint scheme on the leading edges and
>> horizontal stabilizer
>
> Looks like it's just taken off, what with the wheels partly retracted.
>


Or doing what in the air show lingo is known as,

"doing a "dirty flyby" thats when you drop the gear and the flaps
open the bombbay, if you have one, and make a slow pass in
front of the crowd.
then you "clean up" or "get slick" and make a fast pass to show off..

[Dave Moorman]

In article >,
John Szalay > wrote:

> Dave Moorman > wrote in news:nobody-
> :
> >> F-16 of the Royal Netherlands Air Force
> >>
> >>
> >> By playing with the color and contrast you, can make out
> >> the RNAF Roundel on the right wing..
> >> also the "bullseye" paint scheme on the leading edges and
> >> horizontal stabilizer
> >
> > Looks like it's just taken off, what with the wheels partly retracted.
> >
>
>
> Or doing what in the air show lingo is known as,
>
> "doing a "dirty flyby" thats when you drop the gear and the flaps
> open the bombbay, if you have one, and make a slow pass in
> front of the crowd.
> then you "clean up" or "get slick" and make a fast pass to show off..
>
>
>

That's more likely.

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:16:14 +0100, BoilerBill > wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:18:08 -0400, "SKUNK WORKS" >
>wrote:
>
>>in code no less
>
>Snip bliant demonstration of the posters stupidity and lack of usenet
>ability

He actually posted twice as many lines of "code" as I did!
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

"Oh, Jason, take me!" she panted, her breasts heaving like a student on 31p-a-pint night.

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:47:14 GMT, "Aegris"
> wrote:

>
>"Peter Hucker" > kirjoitti
om...
>>I like the effect on the clouds through all that heat.
>>
>> Identification please.....
>> --
>> http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com
>> http://www.petersphotos.com
>
>This part:
>
>)
)=J*:tpsp*++++V+V**)*m*/-...-/...///0162111195536;9<<;9;;=}@FA=}>D?;;BKBDGGIII=}ALNLHNFHIH)*m+///1018228H>;>HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH)ê*;21?4×-+L*,;+-;+)î*I**+/++++++********+,-./012345)î*ß:*,+--,.-//..**+§+,-*.;/<K[k0=}{<1L>>\
>
>Looked liked japanese, but the following made me think twice:
>
>{q¤"*/BÎÏÊ<¼´R5/I·>zK¥{´cÍÎ+´RÊ'RFz+GeúJÌÀ¶$}B¾|´eú,{ï>â
>ÊlO´SoJlz'ÌÂ,8'GRf{=@º2d|ûpgR*̽´{#ûs4/0*ïZ4R̪úRÌ´0>zRÊkusuÄ*kï>{r-ß>Þ¾êRoY"*t]o>6?ì´tR*Ï>ªûj¯ÍH¾¾|B4RÌÂ/1ÙÏ>|=}@¹ð´[v.Ï
>´t*R
>Á^4*tRo*>{o*Y>¾{j0RÌ´*RÌ´*R÷CÍ´*Rʶûj/GÒ̪4R̪4R̪4RÌ«1"1ý´Rj/OW-Pª=}^Ì*ïG'*ù>¾{j/>¡Íç*1o>z*düûü¶ú+oBÍFúZïQt{r§R:Þ?ºD?ÈÞ*É¿
>
>I'm defintely sure, it's Chinese aircraft.
>
>You should send us more data to analyze.

Ah, a non-yenc person with a sense of humour!
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

With Windows 3.11, we were on the edge of the cliff.
With Windows 95, we made a big step forward.

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:18:10 -0500, John Szalay
> wrote:

>Peter Hucker > wrote in
:
>
>> I like the effect on the clouds through all that heat.
>>
>> Identification please.....
>
>F-16 of the Royal Netherlands Air Force
>
>
> By playing with the color and contrast you, can make out
>the RNAF Roundel on the right wing..
>also the "bullseye" paint scheme on the leading edges and
>horizontal stabilizer

Thanks.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

With Windows 3.11, we were on the edge of the cliff.
With Windows 95, we made a big step forward.

[hielan' laddie]

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:52:46 -0400, Peter Hucker wrote
(in article >):

> I like the effect on the clouds through all that heat.
>
> Identification please.....
>

That would be an F-16.

[hielan' laddie]

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:18:08 -0400, SKUNK WORKS wrote
(in article >):

> in code no less

What 'code'? It came through perfectly clearly on my system...

[hielan' laddie]

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:51:35 -0400, Peter Hucker wrote
(in article >):

> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:16:14 +0100, BoilerBill > wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:18:08 -0400, "SKUNK WORKS" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> in code no less
>>
>> Snip bliant demonstration of the posters stupidity and lack of usenet
>> ability
>
> He actually posted twice as many lines of "code" as I did!
>

I suspect that he's too thick to realise that _all_ binaries are encoded
text, and it's just that his newsreader can't handle some types of
encoding... which is not a problem for anyone except him.

[Ron]

On 19-Oct-2008, hielan' laddie > wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:51:35 -0400, Peter Hucker wrote
> (in article >):
>
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:16:14 +0100, BoilerBill > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:18:08 -0400, "SKUNK WORKS" >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> in code no less
> >>
> >> Snip bliant demonstration of the posters stupidity and lack of usenet
> >> ability
> >
> > He actually posted twice as many lines of "code" as I did!
> >
>
> I suspect that he's too thick to realise that _all_ binaries are encoded
> text, and it's just that his newsreader can't handle some types of
> encoding... which is not a problem for anyone except him.

His message has "X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000" in the
header - well known that MS does not support Yenc.

Ron.

[hielan' laddie]

On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:45:48 -0400, Ron wrote
(in article >):

>
> On 19-Oct-2008, hielan' laddie > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:51:35 -0400, Peter Hucker wrote
>> (in article >):
>>
>>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:16:14 +0100, BoilerBill > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:18:08 -0400, "SKUNK WORKS" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> in code no less
>>>>
>>>> Snip bliant demonstration of the posters stupidity and lack of usenet
>>>> ability
>>>
>>> He actually posted twice as many lines of "code" as I did!
>>>
>>
>> I suspect that he's too thick to realise that _all_ binaries are encoded
>> text, and it's just that his newsreader can't handle some types of
>> encoding... which is not a problem for anyone except him.
>
> His message has "X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000" in the
> header - well known that MS does not support Yenc.

Yes. If he wants to use MSOE or MS Mail, he's perfectly welcome to. He
should, however, avoid complaining about problems he'd not have if he used a
real newsreader.

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:45:48 GMT, "Ron" > wrote:

>
>On 19-Oct-2008, hielan' laddie > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:51:35 -0400, Peter Hucker wrote
>> (in article >):
>>
>> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:16:14 +0100, BoilerBill > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:18:08 -0400, "SKUNK WORKS" >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> in code no less
>> >>
>> >> Snip bliant demonstration of the posters stupidity and lack of usenet
>> >> ability
>> >
>> > He actually posted twice as many lines of "code" as I did!
>> >
>>
>> I suspect that he's too thick to realise that _all_ binaries are encoded
>> text, and it's just that his newsreader can't handle some types of
>> encoding... which is not a problem for anyone except him.
>
>His message has "X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000" in the
>header - well known that MS does not support Yenc.

Slly really, as it's usually MS making the new "standards" without
telling anyone else.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

"Beam me aboard, Scotty!" [-] "Will a 2 X 4 do, Captain?"

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 06:53:07 -0400, hielan' laddie
> wrote:

>On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:18:08 -0400, SKUNK WORKS wrote
>(in article >):
>
>> in code no less
>
>What 'code'? It came through perfectly clearly on my system...

You could make a fortune selling them "Enigma machines".
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

"Beam me aboard, Scotty!" [-] "Will a 2 X 4 do, Captain?"