There is NO malware in this zip file - On Topic post of a different type - File 1 of 1 - AmericasSpirit.zip (0/2)

[Lee[_2_]]

Your virus software might go on red alert, but
ONLY because this is a zip file.

Some AV proggies are skittish.

It's clean.

Have fun




---------------------

Here's *my* funny sig from an ABPA thread on 08/16/08:
Alan Erskine > says... "I've got an IQ of 151"
"I'm in the 99th percentile for my age group - that's the top 1 percent"
(nice math there, Einstein!) "I doubt very strongly that you know
anyone in my range of IQ" (Thankfully, NO!)
Lee > discussing newsserver retention:
"...I can go back about 6 months..."
Alan Erskine > interrupts with:
"Why should we wait for six months to download an image
that was posted yesterday?"

[Ron]

"Lee" > wrote in message
6.99...
>
>
> Your virus software might go on red alert, but
> ONLY because this is a zip file.
>
More likely it is going bananas because there's an exe in the ZIP

> Some AV proggies are skittish.
>
And rightfully so... I'm even skittisher.

> It's clean.
>
Because you say so? Sorry, untrusted source, I will not open the EXE-file

> Have fun
>
Thanks. But no, thanks. No offense meant, just being extremely cautious.
:-)

Ron
--
Non urinat in ventum



>
>
>
> ---------------------
>
> Here's *my* funny sig from an ABPA thread on 08/16/08:
> Alan Erskine > says... "I've got an IQ of 151"
> "I'm in the 99th percentile for my age group - that's the top 1 percent"
> (nice math there, Einstein!) "I doubt very strongly that you know
> anyone in my range of IQ" (Thankfully, NO!)
> Lee > discussing newsserver retention:
> "...I can go back about 6 months..."
> Alan Erskine > interrupts with:
> "Why should we wait for six months to download an image
> that was posted yesterday?"
>

[Lee[_2_]]

"Ron" > rudely blurted out news:48fe3534$0$9253$ba620dc5
@nova.planet.nl:

<snip>

Your loss, my oversight

I don't know what I was thinking... must have had
a brain fart. I completely forgot what group I was
dealing with...

The biggest group of scary old women to occupy a
sewing circle.

I bet it makes the average member fill their Depends
when they see that exe file. It is scary enough just
to see posted those mysterious RAR files, the evil-wicked
PAR files, and those damnable Y-encodings.

Interesting how I use a real email address in my posts
and you don't. Although I have spam-bot defenses in the
address, you can still email me by pulling YOUR HEAD out.
Why would I want to post **** that could easily be traced
back to me by way of email or TRUE news-header information,
and thereby be dropped from accounts and possibly put in
jail?

**** it, don't open the gawd-damn thing. It isn't worth the
inestimably valuable time of this group.



---------------------
Here's *my* funny sig from an ABPA thread on 08/16/08:
Alan Erskine > says... "I've got an IQ of 151"
"I'm in the 99th percentile for my age group - that's the top 1 percent"
(nice math there, Einstein!) "I doubt very strongly that you know
anyone in my range of IQ" (Thankfully, NO!)
Lee > discussing newsserver retention:
"...I can go back about 6 months..."
Alan Erskine > interrupts with:
"Why should we wait for six months to download an image
that was posted yesterday?"

[Ron]

"Lee" > wrote in message
6.92...
>
> "Ron" > rudely blurted out news:48fe3534$0$9253$ba620dc5
> @nova.planet.nl:
>
> <snip>
>
> Your loss, my oversight
>
> I don't know what I was thinking... must have had
> a brain fart. I completely forgot what group I was
> dealing with...
>
> The biggest group of scary old women to occupy a
> sewing circle.
>
> I bet it makes the average member fill their Depends
> when they see that exe file. It is scary enough just
> to see posted those mysterious RAR files, the evil-wicked
> PAR files, and those damnable Y-encodings.

Funny how you always switch to being seriously offensive when people don't
do things your way.
>
> Interesting how I use a real email address in my posts
> and you don't. Although I have spam-bot defenses in the
> address, you can still email me by pulling YOUR HEAD out.
> Why would I want to post **** that could easily be traced
> back to me by way of email or TRUE news-header information,
> and thereby be dropped from accounts and possibly put in
> jail?
>
Hold on a second... Are you accusing me of forging my headers? You're not
are you? You wouldn't make the mistakes you're accusing other people of.
Right? Or are you? Cause if you intend to keep that up as the truth, I'd
sure like to see some proof.

> **** it, don't open the gawd-damn thing. It isn't worth the
> inestimably valuable time of this group.
>
Well, now that you mention it: it sure isn't mine.

Ow, by the way: signatures should be at most 4 lines. And a signature should
be set apart by a separator containing two times - and a <space>. In case
you don't understand: have a look at mine. :-)
No offense, just pointing out what you already know, as you've told us again
and again you know how to use Usenet.
>
>
> ---------------------
> Here's *my* funny sig from an ABPA thread on 08/16/08:
> Alan Erskine > says... "I've got an IQ of 151"
> "I'm in the 99th percentile for my age group - that's the top 1 percent"
> (nice math there, Einstein!) "I doubt very strongly that you know
> anyone in my range of IQ" (Thankfully, NO!)
> Lee > discussing newsserver retention:
> "...I can go back about 6 months..."
> Alan Erskine > interrupts with:
> "Why should we wait for six months to download an image
> that was posted yesterday?"
>
>
Kind regards,
Ron
--
Non urinat in ventum

[Alan Erskine[_3_]]

"Ron" > wrote in message
...
> Funny how you always switch to being seriously offensive when people don't
> do things your way.

What do you expect from this troll. It (the troll) has changed his sig more
times than any member of this group would _need_ to change their Depends!

[Br'er Rabid[_2_]]

"Alan Erskine" > with the
IQ of a ****ing retard, rudely blurted out news:
:


>
> What do you expect from this troll. It (the troll) has changed his sig
> more times than any member of this group would _need_ to change their
> Depends!
>
>
>

Love to deflate you self-inflated IQ, Irksome.

Once again you've proven to all that you are a moron
and a LIAR.

I've had ONE sig in the last 5 years and you, Einstein,
are the star of it.

I'll bet you ten thousand dollars, by PayPal account,
that my only sig in this *CENTURY* (just to give you
a chance at winning) is this one with you as the star.

Of course, you won't take the bet 'cause you know you
are nothing but a LIAR. You may do some posturing to
convince those who don't know you... but you're all
B.S. I'll happily back my word with real money, LIAR.

I'll bet another ten thousand dollars, by PayPal account
that every word in my sig is the truth, LIAR.

Also, Einstein, have you reported me to my news service
yet? Your previous lies were, back in August, that I
was forging my headers... if so, how am I still here?
My NewsService cancels accounts of those who forge headers.

It ain't trolling if it's the TRUTH. And you are a LIAR.
See if your astronomic IQ can connect those dots.

-----------------

Here's *my* funny sig from an ABPA thread on 08/16/08:
Alan Erskine > says... "I've got an IQ of 151"
"I'm in the 99th percentile for my age group - that's the top 1 percent"
(nice math there, Einstein!) "I doubt very strongly that you know
anyone in my range of IQ" (Thankfully, NO!)
Lee > discussing newsserver retention:
"...I can go back about 6 months..."
Alan Erskine > interrupts with:
"Why should we wait for six months to download an image
that was posted yesterday?"

[Lee[_2_]]

"Br'er Rabid" > said in
6.81:

(snipped)





Einstein,

In No Limit Hold 'em, it would be said that I
offered you a "tell." After waiting several
hours there's no answer from you.

So your kill filter wouldn't miss this,
I purposefully gave you the other nym I use
to post in the political discussion groups.
In here I use my real name, real email and
an UNFORGED header. (Of course, to email me
you have to pull YOUR HEAD out)

The offer awaits. I say you are a liar.
Wanna put up the money to prove me wrong?


-----------------

Here's *my* funny sig from an ABPA thread on 08/16/08:
Alan Erskine > says... "I've got an IQ of 151"
"I'm in the 99th percentile for my age group - that's the top 1 percent"
(nice math there, Einstein!) "I doubt very strongly that you know
anyone in my range of IQ" (Thankfully, NO!)
Lee > discussing newsserver retention:
"...I can go back about 6 months..."
Alan Erskine > interrupts with:
"Why should we wait for six months to download an image
that was posted yesterday?"

[Ron]

"Lee" > wrote in message
.94...
> "Br'er Rabid" > said in
> 6.81:
>
> (snipped)
>
I'l just ask you again then:

You wrote:
> Interesting how I use a real email address in my posts
> and you don't. Although I have spam-bot defenses in the
> address, you can still email me by pulling YOUR HEAD out.
> Why would I want to post **** that could easily be traced
> back to me by way of email or TRUE news-header information,
> and thereby be dropped from accounts and possibly put in
> jail?
>
Were you accusing me of forging my headers? You're not
are you? You wouldn't make the mistakes you're accusing other people of.
Right? Or are you? Cause if you intend to keep that up as the truth, I'd
sure like to see some proof.

How about it, sport?

Ron (the one with the sig that *is* compliant with usenet rules, and which
has not changed once!)

--
Non urinat in ventum

[Lee[_2_]]

"Ron" > rudely blurted out news:49021926$0$9258$ba620dc5
@nova.planet.nl:

>
> "Lee" > wrote in message
> .94...
>> "Br'er Rabid" > said in
>> 6.81:
>>
>> (snipped)
>>
> I'l just ask you again then:
>
> You wrote:
>> Interesting how I use a real email address in my posts
>> and you don't. Although I have spam-bot defenses in the
>> address, you can still email me by pulling YOUR HEAD out.
>> Why would I want to post **** that could easily be traced
>> back to me by way of email or TRUE news-header information,
>> and thereby be dropped from accounts and possibly put in
>> jail?
>>
> Were you accusing me of forging my headers? You're not
> are you? You wouldn't make the mistakes you're accusing other people of.
> Right? Or are you? Cause if you intend to keep that up as the truth, I'd
> sure like to see some proof.
>
> How about it, sport?
>
> Ron (the one with the sig that *is* compliant with usenet rules, and which
> has not changed once!)
>

Well, sport...

I DID NOT SAY that you forged anything.

What I referred to was Einstein's accusations of me
forging my header information. He has also accused
others in this group of the same thing.

Need verification?

And I've only had one sig - ever. And I offered an
easy-win bet to Gutless to stand by another lie that
he told about me. I posted the challenge so he wouldn't
miss it. If he was telling the truth, he could make a
sizable one-day earning.

....And the crickets keep chirping.

------------------------
Here's *my* funny sig from an ABPA thread on 08/16/08:
Alan Erskine > says... "I've got an IQ of 151"
"I'm in the 99th percentile for my age group - that's the top 1 percent"
(nice math there, Einstein!) "I doubt very strongly that you know
anyone in my range of IQ" (Thankfully, NO!)
Lee > discussing newsserver retention:
"...I can go back about 6 months..."
Alan Erskine > interrupts with:
"Why should we wait for six months to download an image
that was posted yesterday?"

[Peter Hucker[_2_]]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:07:35 +0200, "Ron" > wrote:

>
>"Lee" > wrote in message
6.99...
>>
>>
>> Your virus software might go on red alert, but
>> ONLY because this is a zip file.
>>
>More likely it is going bananas because there's an exe in the ZIP

More likely you need a new virus checker. If your virus checker gives
you an alert every time it sees an exe file, this must make it very
difficult to use your computer. Modern virus checkers actually
analyze the exe file inside.

>> Some AV proggies are skittish.
>>
>And rightfully so... I'm even skittisher.

See a doctor.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

The ant can lift 50 times its own weight, can pull 30 times its own weight, and always falls over on its right side when intoxicated.