Re: Is This Why

[Bear Bottoms[_4_]]

On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:25:55 -0600, hjmler wrote:

>>
>> Why did the nose pith *up*? Why did adding flippers not work right?
>
> you had a wing like the fokker eindecker ...
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fokker_Eindecker
>
> Preliminary Wind Tunnel Testing of WWI Fighters
> the two WWI fighters and to serve as a preliminary study in preparation for
> more . complete stability and control testing performed in November and
> December ...
> pdf.aiaa.org/preview/CDReadyMASM06_778/PV2006_333.pdf -

No.This has nothing to do with my question. why did you bring it up? For
what purpose other than to destroy the group by a cult.
--
Bear Bottoms
website: http://bearware.com

[Bear Bottoms[_4_]]

On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:20:37 -0600, hjmler wrote:

> "Bear Bottoms" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:25:55 -0600, hjmler wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Why did the nose pith *up*? Why did adding flippers not work right?
>>>
>>> you had a wing like the fokker eindecker ...
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fokker_Eindecker
>>>
>>> Preliminary Wind Tunnel Testing of WWI Fighters
>>> the two WWI fighters and to serve as a preliminary study in preparation
> for
>>> more . complete stability and control testing performed in November and
>>> December ...
>>> pdf.aiaa.org/preview/CDReadyMASM06_778/PV2006_333.pdf -
>>
>> No.This has nothing to do with my question. why did you bring it up? For
>> what purpose other than to destroy the group by a cult.
>> --
>> Bear Bottoms
>> website: http://bearware.com
> some wings are designed so poorly that the slightest change in angle of
> attack will pitch them into an unrecoverable stall ..
> maybe yours is a hypersensitive wing too ...

Another Yrrah troll. Or Frankenslime. Who cares. I know planes. The
Seneca was not designed bad. You know nothing of this. LOL! Not a pilot
I see. A sporger. Take these and stuff them.

http://pixdaus.com/pics/R1lKY2Zgq7FiyQQJCf.jpg

The state of affairs and atmosphere created by many / regulars /
is a furtive display of acrimonial and proprietary behavior from a
click of the same people who continuously assault posters on a regular
basis. It is always the same people. I've listed their names many
times...the latest being designated as the "cream team" though I left
out a few of the lesser offenders as they have not been as prevelent.

It is a sad state of affairs. Such behavior is recognized by many
lurkers and causes great harm to the newsgroup. Some of the cream team
are at times very helpful, but the protectionist assault on anyone they
think threatens their dominance more than undercuts their value to the
group.
--

Bear Bottoms
website: http://bearware.com

[Donavan Jeffrey Hammond-Hammond]

On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:47:58 -0500, Bear Bottoms wrote:

> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:20:37 -0600, hjmler wrote:
>
>> "Bear Bottoms" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:25:55 -0600, hjmler wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why did the nose pith *up*? Why did adding flippers not work right?
>>>>
>>>> you had a wing like the fokker eindecker ...
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fokker_Eindecker
>>>>
>>>> Preliminary Wind Tunnel Testing of WWI Fighters
>>>> the two WWI fighters and to serve as a preliminary study in preparation
>> for
>>>> more . complete stability and control testing performed in November and
>>>> December ...
>>>> pdf.aiaa.org/preview/CDReadyMASM06_778/PV2006_333.pdf -
>>>
>>> No.This has nothing to do with my question. why did you bring it up? For
>>> what purpose other than to destroy the group by a cult.
>>> --
>>> Bear Bottoms
>>> website: http://bearware.com
>> some wings are designed so poorly that the slightest change in angle of
>> attack will pitch them into an unrecoverable stall ..
>> maybe yours is a hypersensitive wing too ...
>
> Another Yrrah troll. Or Frankenslime. Who cares. I know planes. The
> Seneca was not designed bad. You know nothing of this. LOL! Not a pilot
> I see. A sporger. Take these and stuff them.
>
> http://pixdaus.com/pics/R1lKY2Zgq7FiyQQJCf.jpg
>
> The state of affairs and atmosphere created by many / regulars /
> is a furtive display of acrimonial and proprietary behavior from a
> click of the same people who continuously assault posters on a regular
> basis. It is always the same people. I've listed their names many
> times...the latest being designated as the "cream team" though I left
> out a few of the lesser offenders as they have not been as prevelent.
>
> It is a sad state of affairs. Such behavior is recognized by many
> lurkers and causes great harm to the newsgroup. Some of the cream team
> are at times very helpful, but the protectionist assault on anyone they
> think threatens their dominance more than undercuts their value to the
> group.

You're daft? Your smoking *more* crack leftover from Mena? What? When
did you meet Clinton at Mena?