HD - 1 Swift MicroJet

[H Dickert]

Here is one that is different. And free (for now).
www.dickert.ca/swift
Mach 1.8 in an aircraft with only a 14' wingspan

[TacAN]

"H Dickert" > wrote in message
...
> Here is one that is different. And free (for now).
> www.dickert.ca/swift
> Mach 1.8 in an aircraft with only a 14' wingspan
>
>

Nice.
But looks remarkably light a Flight Simulator picture.

Graham

[TacAN]

"TacAN" > wrote in message
...
>
> "H Dickert" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Here is one that is different. And free (for now).
>> www.dickert.ca/swift
>> Mach 1.8 in an aircraft with only a 14' wingspan
>>
>>
>
> Nice.
> But looks remarkably light a Flight Simulator picture.
>
> Graham
>

But having said that ......

I have downloaded it with a view to trying it in my FS9 - BUT my system was
not happy with the leading "!" (exclamation mark) in the folder name. Is
this a foible of FS9 or my WinXP ???

You might also try posting this aircraft in the news group:-
alt.games.Microsoft.flight-sim
I'm sure you will find a number of interested fliers in there. :-)

Cheers
Graham

[Andrew Chaplin]

"TacAN" > wrote in message
...
>
> "H Dickert" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Here is one that is different. And free (for now).
>> www.dickert.ca/swift
>> Mach 1.8 in an aircraft with only a 14' wingspan
>>
>>
>
> Nice.
> But looks remarkably light a Flight Simulator picture.

What would pass for trees look more like a line of air burst CS artillery,
and the pale patches on the ground make no sense at all in the NWT (there are
neither deciduous trees nor artillery ranges in the NWT).
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)

[The Old Bloke[_10_]]

"TacAN" > wrote in message
...
>
> "H Dickert" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Here is one that is different. And free (for now).
>> www.dickert.ca/swift
>> Mach 1.8 in an aircraft with only a 14' wingspan
>>
>>
>
> Nice.
> But looks remarkably light a Flight Simulator picture.
>
> Graham
Definitely Flight Sim. See the overspeed message at bottom right.

[TacAN]

"The Old Bloke" > wrote in message
...
>
> "TacAN" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "H Dickert" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Here is one that is different. And free (for now).
>>> www.dickert.ca/swift
>>> Mach 1.8 in an aircraft with only a 14' wingspan
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Nice.
>> But looks remarkably light a Flight Simulator picture.
>>
>> Graham
> Definitely Flight Sim. See the overspeed message at bottom right.

Hi Doug - hows things?
If I remember right, JayDub was interested in this type of aircraft some
months ago.

Graham

[Anyolmouse]

"H Dickert" > wrote in message
...
| Here is one that is different. And free (for now).
| www.dickert.ca/swift
| Mach 1.8 in an aircraft with only a 14' wingspan
|
|
|

Looks like a pregnant BD-5J

--
Anyolmouse

[Jeff[_4_]]

"Andrew Chaplin" > wrote in
:

> "TacAN" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "H Dickert" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Here is one that is different. And free (for now).
>>> www.dickert.ca/swift
>>> Mach 1.8 in an aircraft with only a 14' wingspan
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Nice.
>> But looks remarkably light a Flight Simulator picture.
>
> What would pass for trees look more like a line of air burst CS
> artillery, and the pale patches on the ground make no sense at all in
> the NWT (there are neither deciduous trees nor artillery ranges in the
> NWT).

The lens aperture reflections from aiming toward the sun give it a nice
touch of "realism", though.