Canuck[_3_]
December 21st 08, 04:25 AM
>> I am not sure who made the engines, but I think, and correct me if I am
>> wrong, were Rolls Royce. At least for Air Canada, at any rate. Quality
>> stuff, in my mind.
>>
>> Jacques
>
> Yes, the Air Canada Tri Stars had Rolls Royce engines. I'm not 100%
> certain,
> but I do believe that all L-1011s had Rolls Royce engines. As for the
> crash,
> it was an Eastern L-1011 that crashed into the Everglades. It was a
> combination of pilot error and a malfunction of a stupid bulb. The pilots
> had thought that the gear had not extended prior to landing due to no
> landing gear down and locked light. While they were trying to figure out
> if
> the gear was actually down, they somehow disengaged the autopilot. The
> aircraft gradually lost altitude and slammed into the ground before they
> realized that they were about to crash. A bulb which cost roughly $1.00 or
> less ended up costing a bunch of people their lives. Too weird. It was a
> very reliable aircraft as far as I know (in general) and well liked by the
> crews that flew them. My only "negative" experience was on an outbound
> flight to London. On takeoff, the aircraft rattled and squeaked so much
> that
> it seemed like it was going to fall apart. Most of this was due to a
> fairly
> beat up runway in Winnipeg which has been resurfaced but even the cabin
> crew
> were wondering what was going on.
>
> Nick
>
>
>> wrong, were Rolls Royce. At least for Air Canada, at any rate. Quality
>> stuff, in my mind.
>>
>> Jacques
>
> Yes, the Air Canada Tri Stars had Rolls Royce engines. I'm not 100%
> certain,
> but I do believe that all L-1011s had Rolls Royce engines. As for the
> crash,
> it was an Eastern L-1011 that crashed into the Everglades. It was a
> combination of pilot error and a malfunction of a stupid bulb. The pilots
> had thought that the gear had not extended prior to landing due to no
> landing gear down and locked light. While they were trying to figure out
> if
> the gear was actually down, they somehow disengaged the autopilot. The
> aircraft gradually lost altitude and slammed into the ground before they
> realized that they were about to crash. A bulb which cost roughly $1.00 or
> less ended up costing a bunch of people their lives. Too weird. It was a
> very reliable aircraft as far as I know (in general) and well liked by the
> crews that flew them. My only "negative" experience was on an outbound
> flight to London. On takeoff, the aircraft rattled and squeaked so much
> that
> it seemed like it was going to fall apart. Most of this was due to a
> fairly
> beat up runway in Winnipeg which has been resurfaced but even the cabin
> crew
> were wondering what was going on.
>
> Nick
>
>