kestrel19
April 9th 09, 04:02 PM
On Apr 9, 9:01*am, kestrel19 > wrote:
> On Apr 9, 8:34*am, Martin Gregorie
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:42:28 -0700, NG wrote:
> > > Anybody have a recommendation for a small thin digital camera with
> > > decent quality that might be suitable for taping to a winglet for
> > > inflight down-the-wing shots, with a connection for an rf remote? Have
> > > not been able to find a small camera with remote option. Thanks...
>
> > It might be worth looking at the FlyCamOne, which was developed to take
> > pictures from RC models. It is small, light (37g), records to an SD card
> > and can be remotely tripped via an el-Cheapo RC set or configured to take
> > a shot every few seconds. *The resolution looks to be adequate and the
> > cost is pretty reasonable.
>
> >http://zoogz/reference/reference/misc_photo.html#fco
>
> > --
> > martin@ * | Martin Gregorie
> > gregorie. | Essex, UK
> > org * * * |
>
> http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showatt.php?attachmentid=1377552
>
> Not bad for what it is.
12M file btw.
> On Apr 9, 8:34*am, Martin Gregorie
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:42:28 -0700, NG wrote:
> > > Anybody have a recommendation for a small thin digital camera with
> > > decent quality that might be suitable for taping to a winglet for
> > > inflight down-the-wing shots, with a connection for an rf remote? Have
> > > not been able to find a small camera with remote option. Thanks...
>
> > It might be worth looking at the FlyCamOne, which was developed to take
> > pictures from RC models. It is small, light (37g), records to an SD card
> > and can be remotely tripped via an el-Cheapo RC set or configured to take
> > a shot every few seconds. *The resolution looks to be adequate and the
> > cost is pretty reasonable.
>
> >http://zoogz/reference/reference/misc_photo.html#fco
>
> > --
> > martin@ * | Martin Gregorie
> > gregorie. | Essex, UK
> > org * * * |
>
> http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showatt.php?attachmentid=1377552
>
> Not bad for what it is.
12M file btw.