Transiting the Sun

[Dave Kearton[_3_]]

Stolen shamelessly from NASA's picture of the day website.
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/iotd.html



"Transiting the Sun
In this tightly cropped image, the NASA space shuttle Atlantis is seen in
silhouette during solar transit, Tuesday, May 12, 2009, from Florida. This
image was made before Atlantis and the crew of STS-125 had grappled the
Hubble Space Telescope.

The photographer made this image using a solar-filtered Takahashi 5-inch
refracting telescope and a Canon 5D Mark II digital camera.

Image Credit: NASA/Thierry Legault"


--


Cheers

Dave Kearton

[Mike Mackenzie]

"Dave Kearton" > wrote (in part):

>The photographer made this image using a solar-filtered Takahashi 5-inch
>refracting telescope and a Canon 5D Mark II digital camera.

I thought it might have been taken by Glen :-)

OTOH, you can see the whole aircraft

--
Mike Mackenzie (AVCOM Services)
Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
Remove "XYZ" from the "Reply to" address when responding by email.

[David[_7_]]

On Sat, 16 May 2009 07:48:52 +0000, Mike Mackenzie wrote:

> "Dave Kearton" > wrote (in part):
>
>>The photographer made this image using a solar-filtered Takahashi 5-inch
>>refracting telescope and a Canon 5D Mark II digital camera.
>
> I thought it might have been taken by Glen :-)

That gentleman spells his name with 2 "ll"'s, as in Glenn.

[TacAN]

Mike Mackenzie wrote:
> "Dave Kearton" > wrote (in part):
>
>> The photographer made this image using a solar-filtered Takahashi 5-inch
>> refracting telescope and a Canon 5D Mark II digital camera.
>
> I thought it might have been taken by Glen :-)
>
> OTOH, you can see the whole aircraft
>

But you still can't see any wing tips. :-)

Graham

[TacAN]

Dave Kearton wrote:
> Stolen shamelessly from NASA's picture of the day website.

As we do. :-))


> http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/iotd.html
>
>
>

Top shot, Dave - thanks for sharing.


Graham

[Alan Erskine[_3_]]

"Mike Mackenzie" > wrote in message
...
>
> I thought it might have been taken by Glen :-)

Nah. It's not a close-up.

[arguabLEE]

"Alan Erskine" > wrote in news:EwBPl.11507$y61.5312
@news-server.bigpond.net.au:

>
> Nah. It's not a close-up.
>
>
>


Omigawd! "It" can say something other than SPAM!

Oh wait, I remember that he also spoke months
earlier, bitching about J3's posting of shuttle
pics. Irksome said shuttle shots (and "space" shots)
were not welcome here...

I guess it all depends on whom is posting, eh stupid?.

And Irksome, don't try to defend yourself by giving
some weak-balled excuse about being only against
HOW they were posted. Irksome, you go ahead and try
that **** with me. I can easily show you to be the
liar you are (as done before).

My news service can go back about a year now in this
particular group, some groups as far back as 2005.

Are you still harassing Gus Grissom's widow, Betty?

[Bob (not my real pseudonym)]

On Sat, 16 May 2009 07:34:56 +0930, "Dave Kearton"
> wrote:

>Stolen shamelessly from NASA's picture of the day website.
>http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/iotd.html
>
>
>
>"Transiting the Sun
>In this tightly cropped image, the NASA space shuttle Atlantis is seen in
>silhouette during solar transit, Tuesday, May 12, 2009, from Florida. This
>image was made before Atlantis and the crew of STS-125 had grappled the
>Hubble Space Telescope.
>
>The photographer made this image using a solar-filtered Takahashi 5-inch
>refracting telescope and a Canon 5D Mark II digital camera.
>
>Image Credit: NASA/Thierry Legault"

Another image by the same photographer a day later, showing the
Shuttle, HST ~and~ wingtips!

http://spaceweather.com/swpod2009/14may09/Thierry-Legault1.jpg?PHPSESSID=f3laac0m1ajdf8posi50k4tv01

Bob ^,,^

[Clairbear]

arguabLEE > wrote in
36.99:

> "Alan Erskine" > wrote in
> news:EwBPl.11507$y61.5312 @news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>
>>
>> Nah. It's not a close-up.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Omigawd! "It" can say something other than SPAM!
>
> Oh wait, I remember that he also spoke months
> earlier, bitching about J3's posting of shuttle
> pics. Irksome said shuttle shots (and "space" shots)
> were not welcome here...
>
> I guess it all depends on whom is posting, eh stupid?.
>
> And Irksome, don't try to defend yourself by giving
> some weak-balled excuse about being only against
> HOW they were posted. Irksome, you go ahead and try
> that **** with me. I can easily show you to be the
> liar you are (as done before).
>
> My news service can go back about a year now in this
> particular group, some groups as far back as 2005.
>
> Are you still harassing Gus Grissom's widow, Betty?
>
>

Quick your bitchin' and post some pics
If you don't contribute then don't flame those who do

[arguabLEE[_2_]]

Clairbear > wrote in news:Xns9C0E4997FE787clairbear@
198.186.192.136:

> arguabLEE > wrote in
> 36.99:
>
>> "Alan Erskine" > wrote in
>> news:EwBPl.11507$y61.5312 @news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>>
>>>
>>> Nah. It's not a close-up.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Omigawd! "It" can say something other than SPAM!
>>
>> Oh wait, I remember that he also spoke months
>> earlier, bitching about J3's posting of shuttle
>> pics. Irksome said shuttle shots (and "space" shots)
>> were not welcome here...
>>
>> I guess it all depends on whom is posting, eh stupid?.
>>
>> And Irksome, don't try to defend yourself by giving
>> some weak-balled excuse about being only against
>> HOW they were posted. Irksome, you go ahead and try
>> that **** with me. I can easily show you to be the
>> liar you are (as done before).
>>
>> My news service can go back about a year now in this
>> particular group, some groups as far back as 2005.
>>
>> Are you still harassing Gus Grissom's widow, Betty?
>>
>>
>
> Quick your bitchin' and post some pics
> If you don't contribute then don't flame those who do
>

In the past 30 days, I've posted more that
Irksome has posted in his lifetime. SoSTFU

[Alan Erskine[_3_]]

"Clairbear" > wrote in message
...

> Quick your bitchin' and post some pics
> If you don't contribute then don't flame those who do

It's just a troll; just ignore it.

[Clairbear]

arguabLEE > wrote in
36.93:

> Clairbear > wrote in news:Xns9C0E4997FE787clairbear@
> 198.186.192.136:
>
>> arguabLEE > wrote in
>> 36.99:
>>
>>> "Alan Erskine" > wrote in
>>> news:EwBPl.11507$y61.5312 @news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nah. It's not a close-up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Omigawd! "It" can say something other than SPAM!
>>>
>>> Oh wait, I remember that he also spoke months
>>> earlier, bitching about J3's posting of shuttle
>>> pics. Irksome said shuttle shots (and "space" shots)
>>> were not welcome here...
>>>
>>> I guess it all depends on whom is posting, eh stupid?.
>>>
>>> And Irksome, don't try to defend yourself by giving
>>> some weak-balled excuse about being only against
>>> HOW they were posted. Irksome, you go ahead and try
>>> that **** with me. I can easily show you to be the
>>> liar you are (as done before).
>>>
>>> My news service can go back about a year now in this
>>> particular group, some groups as far back as 2005.
>>>
>>> Are you still harassing Gus Grissom's widow, Betty?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Quick your bitchin' and post some pics
>> If you don't contribute then don't flame those who do
>>
>
> In the past 30 days, I've posted more that
> Irksome has posted in his lifetime. SoSTFU

Rather funny that I have not seen them here but then why would someone
as rude as you lie?

[Clairbear]

"Alan Erskine" > wrote in news:eFXPl.11780
:

> "Clairbear" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Quick your bitchin' and post some pics
>> If you don't contribute then don't flame those who do
>
> It's just a troll; just ignore it.
>
>
>

ghank for all you and others post here I wish I had something i could
contribute

[Graeme Hogan]

"David" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 16 May 2009 07:48:52 +0000, Mike Mackenzie wrote:
>
>> "Dave Kearton" > wrote (in part):
>>
>>>The photographer made this image using a solar-filtered Takahashi 5-inch
>>>refracting telescope and a Canon 5D Mark II digital camera.
>>
>> I thought it might have been taken by Glen :-)
>
> That gentleman spells his name with 2 "ll"'s, as in Glenn.
>
>

You sure it aint 2 "pp" as in Glenn.

[Alan Erskine[_3_]]

"Clairbear" > wrote in message
...

> ghank for all you and others post here I wish I had something i could
> contribute

You can still contribute by encouraging others to post images; that's what I
do.

[David[_7_]]

On Mon, 18 May 2009 17:21:44 +1000, Graeme Hogan wrote:

> "David" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sat, 16 May 2009 07:48:52 +0000, Mike Mackenzie wrote:
>>
>>> "Dave Kearton" > wrote (in part):
>>>
>>>>The photographer made this image using a solar-filtered Takahashi
>>>>5-inch refracting telescope and a Canon 5D Mark II digital camera.
>>>
>>> I thought it might have been taken by Glen :-)
>>
>> That gentleman spells his name with 2 "ll"'s, as in Glenn.
>>
>>
>>
> You sure it aint 2 "pp" as in Glenn.

No, there's not one "p" in Glenn.

[Sly Fox]

"David" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 17:21:44 +1000, Graeme Hogan wrote:
>
>> "David" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sat, 16 May 2009 07:48:52 +0000, Mike Mackenzie wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Dave Kearton" > wrote (in part):
>>>>
>>>>>The photographer made this image using a solar-filtered Takahashi
>>>>>5-inch refracting telescope and a Canon 5D Mark II digital camera.
>>>>
>>>> I thought it might have been taken by Glen :-)
>>>
>>> That gentleman spells his name with 2 "ll"'s, as in Glenn.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> You sure it aint 2 "pp" as in Glenn.
>
> No, there's not one "p" in Glenn.

Well ... he should drink more fluid. Obviously he is seriously dehydrated

Dr Fox