Log in

View Full Version : Re: Winch Launch Fatality


Ed Gaddy[_2_]
June 23rd 09, 09:00 PM
At 18:34 23 June 2009, bildan wrote:
>On Jun 23, 11:14=A0am, John Smith wrote:
>> bildan wrote:
>> > Answer the question: =A0WHY A PRIORITY?
>>
>> Because it's automatic and then it's done and you can fully
concentrate
>> on more important things like speed, coordinated flight and where to
>> land. And, surprise, your glider flies better without that chute
>> dangling in the wind, which may make the difference between a
non-event
>> and an event.
>>
>> But I understand that you're fully absorbed by staring at your AOA
>> indicator and therefore don't have any capacity left to pull the
release
>> knob.
>
>
>
>Do it because it's automatic! That's no reason at all.
>
>Do it so you can get it out of the way and get on with the important
>stuff like saving your life! Are you really thinking about what
>you're writing?
>
>If the drag of a parachute/rope is great enough a glider 'flies
>significantly better without it', it will back release because of that
>very drag. In fact, a parachute pulled by its apex has little drag.
>Either way, it's a non-issue.
>
>What we've done, without really thinking about it, is put a relatively
>unimportant action - pulling the release - ahead of a series of very
>urgent steps the pilot must take to avoid a serious accident. This
>has almost certainly made an unfortunate contribution to the overall
>accident record.
>
>The first step in writing ANY EMERGENCY CHECKLIST is to eliminate all
>actions that do not contribute to a safe outcome and then to
>prioritize the remaining steps with the most urgent at the top.
>Pulling the release does not contribute materially to a safe outcome
>and, in any event, is not urgent enough to be anywhere near the top of
>the list.
>
>As for an AOA indicator, you're damn right I'd be looking at it - and
>flying a much safer recovery as a result.
>

When the parachute covers the canopy, the AOA will be all that you have to
look at. This happened to me once on a winch launch. I'll take the extra
5 sec to get rid of the cable.

David Chapman
June 23rd 09, 09:45 PM
I saw a K13 in the UK have 1/4 of it tailplane removed, and at same club
the parachute somehow got on top of the wing. The instructor rolled
towards the cable to try to get it to slide off, only to have it catch in
the alieron. ####! This was many years ago and i forget how the cable
finally freed, but in both cases glider landed in a controlled fashion.
Root cause was discoved after second accident - parachute too big.

Two real points,
#1 winch or aerotow, hand on cable release at least until clear of the
ground, the benefit to release instantly is greater than risk of an
accidental release.

#2 winch/auto-tow cable break,

establish the appropriate nose down attitude quickly (as discussed here,
this depends on the stage of launch, but the recipricol of the climb is a
good approximation) but quickly, quickly, quickly, so this may mean close
to zero g as the nose goes down, and this needs practice to convince pilot
to quickly establish and maintain appropriate attitude, despite the
"stalled" sensations that will be induced, but note the wing is never
stalled particularly if you are appropriatly quick to establish the
correct attitude.

When the apropriate attitude is established it may still take several
seconds to establish the appropiate speed. Now is the time to dump the
cable and take a deep breath and "aviate" ...
Here is is simple, low? land ahead, space to land ahead? land ahead,
If no space to land ahead you will be high enough to implenet the
"eventualites" preparred before take off.

This youtube demonstrates incorrect attitude & pilot fully asleep

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvK1ONl1CqE&feature=channel_page

This youtube shows even a slight negative g (watch straps and stuff fly
up) as apropriate attitude is achieved, quickly quickly quickly , ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4csksheL-o4

Cable breaks happen often, none need be dangerous.

David.




At 20:00 23 June 2009, Ed Gaddy wrote:
>At 18:34 23 June 2009, bildan wrote:
>>On Jun 23, 11:14=A0am, John Smith wrote:
>>> bildan wrote:
>>> > Answer the question: =A0WHY A PRIORITY?
>>>
>>> Because it's automatic and then it's done and you can fully
>concentrate
>>> on more important things like speed, coordinated flight and where to
>>> land. And, surprise, your glider flies better without that chute
>>> dangling in the wind, which may make the difference between a
>non-event
>>> and an event.
>>>
>>> But I understand that you're fully absorbed by staring at your AOA
>>> indicator and therefore don't have any capacity left to pull the
>release
>>> knob.
>>
>>
>>
>>Do it because it's automatic! That's no reason at all.
>>
>>Do it so you can get it out of the way and get on with the important
>>stuff like saving your life! Are you really thinking about what
>>you're writing?
>>
>>If the drag of a parachute/rope is great enough a glider 'flies
>>significantly better without it', it will back release because of that
>>very drag. In fact, a parachute pulled by its apex has little drag.
>>Either way, it's a non-issue.
>>
>>What we've done, without really thinking about it, is put a relatively
>>unimportant action - pulling the release - ahead of a series of very
>>urgent steps the pilot must take to avoid a serious accident. This
>>has almost certainly made an unfortunate contribution to the overall
>>accident record.
>>
>>The first step in writing ANY EMERGENCY CHECKLIST is to eliminate all
>>actions that do not contribute to a safe outcome and then to
>>prioritize the remaining steps with the most urgent at the top.
>>Pulling the release does not contribute materially to a safe outcome
>>and, in any event, is not urgent enough to be anywhere near the top of
>>the list.
>>
>>As for an AOA indicator, you're damn right I'd be looking at it - and
>>flying a much safer recovery as a result.
>>
>
>When the parachute covers the canopy, the AOA will be all that you have
to
>look at. This happened to me once on a winch launch. I'll take the
extra
>5 sec to get rid of the cable.
>

John Smith
June 23rd 09, 10:18 PM
Ed Gaddy wrote:

> I'll take the extra 5 sec to get rid of the cable.

Surely this is a typo and you've meant 0.5 Seconds.

Ed Gaddy[_2_]
June 23rd 09, 11:15 PM
At 21:18 23 June 2009, John Smith wrote:
>Ed Gaddy wrote:
>
>> I'll take the extra 5 sec to get rid of the cable.
>
>Surely this is a typo and you've meant 0.5 Seconds.
>

Yes I left out the .

Google