David \Bear Bottoms\ W
July 12th 09, 01:44 AM
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:41:05 +0100, hummingbird wrote:
> 'Bear Bottoms' wrote thus:
>
>>Warren Harley > wrote in
:
>>
>>> Franklin wrote:
>>>> Dear Bottoms
>>>>
>>>> Could you kindly help me understand if there are any explanations I
>>>> may have overlooked about the way in which you and the sockpuppet
>>>> "David W" have been posting?
>>>>
>>>> As an example, here are some posts for May 15th and 16th. (The time
>>>> of day has been normalized to GMT Zero with Daylight Saving.)
>>>>
>>>> <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0696/Bottoms_sock>
>>>> <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0227/Bottoms_sock_page2>
>>>>
>>>> It's no co-incidence when a group of 13 posts are made under the name
>>>> "Bear Bottoms", then seconds later a group of 20 posts are made under
>>>> "David W", then immediately afterwards 10 more posts are made under
>>>> "Bear Bottoms", quickly followed by 18 posts under "David W". It
>>>> goes on but I'll stop there.
>>>>
>>>> There's a close connection between posts made under the name "Bear
>>>> Bottoms" and those made under the name "David W".
>>>>
>>>> Could you let me know what your favored explanation is?
>>>>
>>>> I'd be grateful if you could answer this as "Bear Bottoms" rather
>>>> than through a sock.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> Franklin
>>>
>>> My dear friend and fellow colleague Franklin,
>>>
>>> You have still miserably failed to provide us with any sort of
>>> substantial proof of anything you've written. As it stands, it's
>>> merely your belief, and nothing more, that Bear Bottoms and David W
>>> are one and the same person.
>>>
>>> You claim it is no coincidence that they happened to be posting around
>>> the same time. But surely you can understand why that is no reason to
>>> believe they are the same person. That happens quite frequently here
>>> in Usenet.
>>>
>>> It's alright if you wish to believe in your "Theory of Sameness", but
>>> I must ask that you show us some non-circumstantial evidence to back
>>> up your opinion (which is all it actually is). Otherwise, I'm afraid
>>> you're going to have a very difficult time getting anyone here to
>>> subscribe to your conjecture.
>>>
>>> Thank-you ever so much for your kind consideration,
>>> Warren H.
>>>
>>I can save you some time. I have never posted as anyone but myself...Bear
>>Bottoms. Franklin is a nut case.
>
> Worse, he's claiming to be a pilot in several other threads,
> here and elsewhere.
Franklin's not a pilot? He's lying...again. <sigh>
Earth shattering news. Here we had so hoped he had his super-sized ego
in check and would be satisfied playing with his copy of FX.
What is this world coming to when Mxmaniac can morph like a chameleon?
lol
--
PWH and the Pricelessware Con Game - Exposed
http://tinyurl.com/knogy8
> 'Bear Bottoms' wrote thus:
>
>>Warren Harley > wrote in
:
>>
>>> Franklin wrote:
>>>> Dear Bottoms
>>>>
>>>> Could you kindly help me understand if there are any explanations I
>>>> may have overlooked about the way in which you and the sockpuppet
>>>> "David W" have been posting?
>>>>
>>>> As an example, here are some posts for May 15th and 16th. (The time
>>>> of day has been normalized to GMT Zero with Daylight Saving.)
>>>>
>>>> <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0696/Bottoms_sock>
>>>> <http://h.imagehost.org/view/0227/Bottoms_sock_page2>
>>>>
>>>> It's no co-incidence when a group of 13 posts are made under the name
>>>> "Bear Bottoms", then seconds later a group of 20 posts are made under
>>>> "David W", then immediately afterwards 10 more posts are made under
>>>> "Bear Bottoms", quickly followed by 18 posts under "David W". It
>>>> goes on but I'll stop there.
>>>>
>>>> There's a close connection between posts made under the name "Bear
>>>> Bottoms" and those made under the name "David W".
>>>>
>>>> Could you let me know what your favored explanation is?
>>>>
>>>> I'd be grateful if you could answer this as "Bear Bottoms" rather
>>>> than through a sock.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> Franklin
>>>
>>> My dear friend and fellow colleague Franklin,
>>>
>>> You have still miserably failed to provide us with any sort of
>>> substantial proof of anything you've written. As it stands, it's
>>> merely your belief, and nothing more, that Bear Bottoms and David W
>>> are one and the same person.
>>>
>>> You claim it is no coincidence that they happened to be posting around
>>> the same time. But surely you can understand why that is no reason to
>>> believe they are the same person. That happens quite frequently here
>>> in Usenet.
>>>
>>> It's alright if you wish to believe in your "Theory of Sameness", but
>>> I must ask that you show us some non-circumstantial evidence to back
>>> up your opinion (which is all it actually is). Otherwise, I'm afraid
>>> you're going to have a very difficult time getting anyone here to
>>> subscribe to your conjecture.
>>>
>>> Thank-you ever so much for your kind consideration,
>>> Warren H.
>>>
>>I can save you some time. I have never posted as anyone but myself...Bear
>>Bottoms. Franklin is a nut case.
>
> Worse, he's claiming to be a pilot in several other threads,
> here and elsewhere.
Franklin's not a pilot? He's lying...again. <sigh>
Earth shattering news. Here we had so hoped he had his super-sized ego
in check and would be satisfied playing with his copy of FX.
What is this world coming to when Mxmaniac can morph like a chameleon?
lol
--
PWH and the Pricelessware Con Game - Exposed
http://tinyurl.com/knogy8