In article rs.com,
says...

In article XjnCb.319371$Dw6.1091097@attbi_s02,
Juan..E.-Jimenez b*d&5^-@-*b(d)5+.!c#o$m wrote:
Where's the proof?

Where's *your* proof that _any_ of the following are true:
A) He wasn't at SnF at all
B) He was there, but he didn't have a truck there
C) He was there with a truck, but the truck wasn't his.


Can you even identify _which_ of the above scenarios is what you actually
claim to be "true"?

Or are you still an admitted liar and fraud?


Remember, it's all about the credibility you don't have...

Remember, it's all about the credibility *YOU* don't have...

Well done :-) Oh I'm sure jaun won't answer, he and zoomy never do when
painted into a corner. Their forte' is making statements about people or
companies with the intention of doing the most harm then either running away or
changing the tactic. But never ever answering the question "where's the proof?"

That was the tactic with zooms magazine US Aviator and it's the same with ANN.
Both were filled with promises of honesty ,truth and values with an openness to
the reading public. It was true as long as you agreed with zoom ,but if you
didn't he would prevent any of your comments from ever seeing the light of day.
So much for his willingness to accept criticism or giving both sides of a story.
Both zoom and jaun are phonies .

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"I'll put my credibility against zoom and jaun any day ,any time" chuck s