Andrew Toppan wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:16:48 GMT, "Thomas Schoene"
wrote:
And the last couple fo P-3 life extensions have run into unexpected
airframe issues, so new construction might be desirable.
I have a hard time seeing a life extension as being practical,
considering the Navy is cutting the active P-3 force in half, and
reducing the deployment cycle of the remainder, over fatigue issues.
Yes, The P-3 service life assssment turned up smoe unpleasant surprises in
terms of fatigue life expenditure.
The idea behind Orion-21 is that rather than patching the trouble spots,
they would just replace the parts that are suffering fatigue problems. I
believe Orion-21 would get an entirely new wing, for example.
--
Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail
"If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing
special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed)
|