ojunk (Mike Weeks) wrote:
Jim Watt _way wrote:
(Mike Weeks) wrote:
Jim Watt _way wrote:
(Mike Weeks) wrote:

Oops; it's a comment made in 2002 by the 1967 [then-CIA director] Helms in
that
BBC trash production of "Dead on the Water"
Is it trash because it comes to a different conclusion to you?
You should really appreciate this; it's trash because it's a fairy tale.
And the evidence for that statement is?

You have yet to show any evidence that the book "The Liberty Incident" is a
fairy tale; since you admit to not having read it.

This is not evidence. This is 'changing the subject.' Whether or
not Watt read Cristol's book is hardly evidence that the BBC
production is a 'fairy tale.' This is just another example of the
kind of non sequitur Weeks often uses to muddy the waters.
How typical.

I've seen this video, and when they use a cropped BDA photo taken from a Mirage
IIICJ(R) which has been widely published since 1967 showing destroyed EAF MiGs
on the ground and attempt to pass it off as having been taken from an USAF
RF-4C flying for the IAF, piloted by USAF crews ...

The cropped photo doesn't show the Mirage's shadow at the bottom ...

You get just one example. Come back after you've read Cristol's book ...

Again, to imply that Watt's reading Cristol's book or not is 'evidence'
that the BBC production is a 'fairy tale' is totally bogus.

Your alleged proof concerning a cropped photo is your own personal
view, and as such is not evidence, it is just your opinion. This
just another example of the non-entity know as Weeks being omniscient.