(Steve Richter) wrote in message . com...
wrote in message . com...
(Issac Goldberg) wrote in message . com...
How it is a lie when the Court's findings were altered
after they were submitted by Kidd to his superiors?

And Kidd never found that out...
And no copies are kept in different places...
And nobody realizes that his testimony was altered...

If Boston knew that the records were altered then is was
is right, and duty, to tell Kidd and the JAG. Telling his
story only after Kidd was dead, is a little strange.

I see no possiblity that Boston is lying

If Boston is not lying then it is his *duty* to notify Congress and/or
Navy brass and/or JAG that the "records were altered." Obstruction of
Justice is a very serious matter.

And it's probable that testimony was taken
out of the NCOI report because it was judged inflamatory or of
questionable veracity by whoever in the DOD that conducted the final
review.

Only the court has the right to alter the court records.
All the DoD can do is to stamp a big "Top Secret" on the inflamatory
parts.