View Single Post
  #71  
Old July 16th 04, 09:02 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Watt wrote in message . ..
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:51:20 -0600, "Norma"
wrote:


"Jim Watt" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:18:17 -0400, wrote:

Why do they not bitch about the Cole bombing like they
do the liberty's. now answer the question ass clown

Well king of the ass clowns the answer is obvious, the
people responsible for the Cole attack are either dead
or currently being prosecuted.

Don't you read the news?


Where is Mr. Osama being tried? That isn't true. The situations are so
different that I wonder why this comes up so cyclically. Amazing. But it
is nice to see Mike Weeks name occasionally. Norma


I posted this news item 08/07/04

Six charged over USS Cole

Six militants were charged with the October 2000 bombing of the
American destroyer Cole which killed 17 sailors in the Yemeni port of
Aden.

The men, including the main suspect, Abdel Rahim al-Nashiri, who is
being tried in his absence because he is in US custody, were also
accused of being members of al-Qa'eda.

--

Interestingly enough if you look on the FBI website they do not
specifically mention Osama (Usama) in connection with the Cole,
or indeed the WTC although they now add a catch-all.

http://www.fbi.gov/mostwant/terrorists/terubl.htm

However, all of this although interesting in itself is digression


Interestingly enough, Osama was there in Yemen when it happened.
There was a marriage occuring to insure some kind of alliance, but he
was not blamed directly. That is a coincidence, isn't it? Norma