"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:7w4Fb.613934$Fm2.554804@attbi_s04...
No more side-scrolling, I hope!

I guess it depends on what your goals are.

You haven't eliminated side-scrolling. You've just made it less likely. As
long as you require a certain number of photos per row of photos, there will
be a browser window size that results in side-scrolling.

Of course, at a ridiculously narrow window size, smaller than the width of
the navigation frame plus one picture, it will be impossible to get rid of
side-scrolling. But it ought to at least be possible to guarantee no
side-scrolling down to that size.

But if you only care about "common" sizes (for example, a minimum of 800
pixels wide), I suppose the table solution you're using is sufficient.

Pete