"G.R. Patterson III"  wrote in message 
... 
 Ron is correct. The regulations were changed in 1997. We now have two 
 separate endorsements (the "high-performance" endorsement was added). 
Under 
 the old regs, there was only one. 
 
I know the regulations were changed in 1997.  If you'd been paying 
attention, you'd have noticed I said so. 
 
But the previous regulation required the endorsement to apply to complex or 
high-performance separately "AS APPROPRIATE".  Nothing in the regulation 
could be logically regarded to mean that an endorsement for high-performance 
aircraft would apply to complex aircraft as well.  The regulation took pains 
to call out that the endorsement needed to be APPROPRIATE to the clause 
referred to in the regulation.  That is, complex OR high performance. 
 
The new regulation is simply a clarified restatement of the old one.  It's 
not semantically different. 
 
Pete 
 
 
 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	 |