"Richard Kaplan" wrote:
If you are planning to invest in an installed system then I agree the WSI
system is the best at this point. It is a "transmission" rather than
"request" system so therefore you can get continually updated weather
data.

What, in your opinion, makes this system superior to Bendix/King's KMD 250,
KDR 510 uplink system? Both are transmission systems, one satellite, one
ground, how do they compare otherwise?

I was pleasantly surprised by B/K's system at OSH. It seemed easy to use and
the update speed ane resolution were very good. Its high baud rate seemed to
eliminate some of the software funny business that satellite based systems
resort to for getting images through their limited bandwith.

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM