"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article mNd1b.170452$Oz4.43720@rwcrnsc54, "Bob Gardner"
wrote:

Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Probably driven by the University's
insurance carrier.

since when do insurance carriers make "reasonable" policies wrt
flying?


They are basically saying that the University is not to have its employees
traveling by air in a manner that has a vastly greater fatal accident rate
(more than 10x) than commercial flying.



Many institutions/companys flat out forbid travel by non-commercial air.

which doesn't make this one reasonable.

See above.

--
Bob Noel