View Single Post
  #2  
Old August 11th 04, 01:26 PM
CB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Martin Hotze wrote:

I'd say that there must be a price at which it is cheaper to let the

passenger
stay behind than carrying him along. (weight -- fuel, eating,

drinking,
cleaning costs).


On a typical domestic U.S. flight, it's negligible. There's almost no

additional fuel
cost to carrying the extra 200 pounds or so, the food is a bag of peanuts

and half a
coke (total cost about $1), and the cleaning staff have to spend a few

hours on that
plane whether you fly or not.


There is nothing worse on a flight than finding out someone paid half or
less for the same trip. I suppose airlines have to take into account the
damage done by going for the last $ than keeping those smucks who have paid
through the nose happy. Afterall, if they fly the income is probably worth
more than 5 cheapies.