"Dude" wrote in message
...

My statement on the 20 vs. 22 number is based on incidents and fatalities
per 100k hours. The fleet of 20's may not have a million hours which
seems to be the least amount acceptable to the statistician types. Those
who refuse to accept the data generally want a different number. The pro
Cirrus crowd thinks you should ignore all the data before a certain
number, and ignore CFIT accidents. The Cessna Beech crowd want an ever
growing history. In other words, to compare to their planes you need 20
years of records and will need 30 years in another ten, etc. etc.


Why do they want to ignore CFIT accidents?

Mike
MU-2