Thanks for clarifying my own post and being *really* picky about the
wording... I guess I did it to the other guy so I'll just throw a
marshmellow on the fi

I really liked the Katana - except for the rudder pedals, and wish I
had fit better!

These are the problems with USENET - when you're talking in person
with somebody, it's easy to clarify... when reading their text, it's
easy to take out of context. You're 100% correct - my title wasn't
perfect, and I still stand by my last suggestion to anyone: Try the
Katana, if you fit, you'll probably like it.

Blue Skies,
Noah

Different people have different geometry - I have a very tall
torso and shorter legs... the instructor was very surprised, but with
my lightspeeds on and slouching, we literally couldn't shut the
canopy. Disagree all you want - that's what happened.

Your subject reads "not for the tall!" In your post, you wrote "If you're
over 5'8"...forget about the Katana".

Those are (incorrect) statements of fact, not opinion. John's disagreement
was with those statements of fact. No reason for you to get offended by his
disagreement since, after all, you were incorrect to make those statements.

Funny thing is, you even explained in your "take offense" post why it is
your original statements of fact were not correct, in spite of your own
personal experience (that some tall people have short torsos and vice a
versa).

Pete