View Single Post
  #56  
Old November 17th 03, 10:16 PM
John E. Carty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article d7aub.226068$Tr4.669834@attbi_s03, "Jay Honeck"
wrote:

I don't mean to sound rude, but if the sites are invisible to you

because
of
YOUR choice of browser, how is this anyone's problem but yours?

Blaming the website, when it is clearly a limitation of your browser, is
illogical.


not exactly. A website, by definition, claims to comply with the
HTML standards. A browser, by definition, is able to render HTML.



If a compliant browser can't properly display a webpage because
the site has invalid HTML, the fault lies with the site.


Valid by whose definition, W3C? The guidelines they come out with are
interpreted so differently by companies like Microsoft and Netscape that
it's hard to define valid :-)


The whole point of the www is to move away from closed systems
and properitary software. The point is to move to platform
independance.

--
Bob Noel