Well, that was the puprose of the plane I was thinking of; skydivers off a
grass strip . However, I've been to Cessna's site and compared the
performances of the 206H and T206 and other than the small increase in speed
and double cruise altitude, I found no differences in landing and takeoff
performance and in capacity in general. Since you fly both versions, could
you, from experience, outline any differences in TO and LDG performance
between the two?

Triple Delta

"Dale" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"DeltaDeltaDelta" wrote:

Does anybody know what are the takeoff and landing rolls (fully loaded)
on a
soft field for a normally aspired STOL conversion-equipped 206 (any
popular
conversion)?

I fly both normally aspirated and turbo-charged P206s hauling skydivers
off of a grass strip. The airplanes have the Sportsman STOL leading
edge, WingX Stol extended wingtips and vortex generators. Most takeoffs
are within 100-200 pounds of gross weight and field elevation is 250MSL.
Ground roll is around 600 feet.

--
Dale L. Falk

There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing around with airplanes.

http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html