View Single Post
  #4  
Old January 16th 04, 09:31 PM
Jim
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I gave a TW pilot a BFR several months ago. I'm not tw-endorsed. My
reasons were as Ron stated above. I made it clear that I could not act as
PIC. I still will not however act as a safety pilot for him during IFR work
because I am not endorsed to act as PIC of a tailwheel aircraft.
--
Jim Burns III

Remove "nospam" to reply


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Ron Natalie wrote:

Seems like Lynch is making things up again.


Sounds like it to me. IIRC, only two of the several CFIs from whom I have

taken
reviews in tailwheel aircraft actually had the tailwheel signoff. It was

simply
made clear to me by the others that they could not serve as PIC and I was

not to
think that they were PIC on the flight. The FAR that Lynch quotes requires

a
"qualified instructor", not that the instructor be a qualified PIC.

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually

said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."