"R.Hubbell" wrote:

On 17 Jan 2004 01:26:09 GMT ackatyu (Wdtabor) wrote:


I'd say his military record serves to discount your theory.



What, like the part about him being removed from command for reasons having to
do with personal integrity?

You're still expecting us to take your word for it? His exemplary service
in the military speaks for itself.

History has shown clearly that generals don't make good Presidents. Why would
somebody whose occupation is a soldier be better/worse than anybody else for
President?