"R.Hubbell" wrote:

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:33:48 -0500 Lisa Hughes wrote:



"R.Hubbell" wrote:

On 17 Jan 2004 01:26:09 GMT ackatyu (Wdtabor) wrote:


I'd say his military record serves to discount your theory.



What, like the part about him being removed from command for reasons having to
do with personal integrity?

You're still expecting us to take your word for it? His exemplary service
in the military speaks for itself.

History has shown clearly that generals don't make good Presidents. Why would
somebody whose occupation is a soldier be better/worse than anybody else for
President?


Not sure what you're talking about, did you post to the wrong message?

In regards to Wesley Clark's integrity his exemplary service in the military
speaks for itself.

No I posted to the right message. Read what I said again.

With regards to Wesley Clark's integrity and his "exemplary service in the military,"
could you please expain exactly why Clark was relieved as NATO commander months before
his tour was finished? Why did he suddenly retire? Why didn't he serve out his
tour???

How many civilian casualties were there in Serbia? Why were trains full of civilians
decimated and then Clark claimed that the "train was moving to fast" to avoid
targeting? Gosh I had no idea that Serbia had invented such fast trains.

Finally, why did Clark change his positions so radically? I hope we would make a
better President and I hope he wouldn't mysteriously disappear from the White House
three (3) years into the job, like his disappearing act before his tour was finished,
if he were to be elected.