On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:15:31 -0600 Big John wrote:

R

1. I wouldn't vote for him in the Iowa vote today if I were back there
in my home town.



I guess I don't care if you'd vote for him or not. Thanks for sharing
anyway.



2. If perchance he were to win the Democratic primaries and be the
democrat running against Bush (heaven forbid), I would not vote for
him.

Of course, follows from above.


3. He supposedly learned about "Duty, Honor & Country" at the Academy
but his actions eschew those standards on his part.


Well did all those medals just fly out of nowhere to him?



4. Read what the Generals who fired his ass in Europe say now that
they are retired and can talk.

Fired his ass? They were upset because he went over their heads
to the whitehouse and the press and state dept.


If you persist, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn that I'd like to sell
you. As Barnum (?) said, there's a sucker born every minute.

This is called a non-sequitar of if you'd like nonsense. You're
calling into question the career of a General who served his country
bravely and resolutely.


Big John
Cullen 15086

I too have long and honorable service and received many decorations
for bravery while under enemy fire, etc.

If you can dismiss the career of a General so easily why would I
believe that your accomplishments are untarnished?

Or are you saying that if you can do it then Wesley Clark's
military career is no big deal?

Stick with what you know. Relying on innuendo is not a good habit.


R. Hubbell




On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:43:46 -0800, "R.Hubbell"
wrote:

On 17 Jan 2004 01:26:09 GMT ackatyu (Wdtabor) wrote:


I'd say his military record serves to discount your theory.



What, like the part about him being removed from command for reasons having to
do with personal integrity?

You're still expecting us to take your word for it? His exemplary service
in the military speaks for itself.

Just more vacuous vitriol.



R. Hubbell


Don

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG