"Patrick Kormann" wrote in message


But as I'm only
learning to fly right now and didn't even have my first flying lesson
yet (because of bad weather) I'm not so sure what I'll really need.

In my opinion, I would recommend that you not spend the money on these
"toys" until you have assurance that you'll get solid utility from them.

soapbox
I don't think you'll find a good use for these tools until at least your
cross-country phase of solo flight. Even then, I recommend not relying too
heavily on technology for these flights. Rather, my opinion is you should
be focused on learning pilotage. Electrical systems fail and batteries
die - and if Murphy has anything to do with it, they'll both happen at the
same time. Knowing how to fly effectively without the technology will save
you a lot of anxiety in that case.
/soapbox

With all that said, I am a former Palm user converted to PocketPC. They
both have their advantages, but PocketPC offers greater
compatibility/integration with my Windows desktops than Palm does. I also
prefer the general user experience and operating system features on the PPC
device. Also, I haven't found a Palm device with a color screen as readable
as my iPAQ.

On the other hand, I find that Palm software is much "snappier" in most
cases. (Having developed software for both platforms, I can offer some
insight into why that's the case.) Palm still has a larger market share and
that generally equates to a greater selection of software.

If you can, try both platforms to see which environment you prefer. There
are various hardware models to choose from for each platform, but I'd try to
focus more on the OS features first, then branch out to hardware features
(like expansion ports, expandable memory, etc.).

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________