View Single Post
  #5  
Old February 1st 04, 02:51 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Fisher" wrote in message
...
Well, in your eyes, perhaps, which means precisely zip in my eyes. The

law
damn sure doesn't see it that way.


The law certainly does see it that way.

You asked for citations supporting the fact that making copies and even
downloading music from "illegal" sources (which aren't illegal . . . yet)
for personal use is frowned upon only by the RIAA and you.


I did not. The citations I asked for were with respect to the question of
copying music from the radio. Nothing more, nothing less. They have
nothing to do with your use of file sharing software to violate copyright
law.

Those citations have rather embarrassingly negated your entire premise and
illuminated your profound ignorance of the law.


There have been no such citations, not with respect to copying music from
the radio, nor with respect to downloading music from the Internet. They
have not negated anything about my premise, never mind come close to
negating the entire premise. Nor have they revealed any ignorance on my
part of the law.

I hate it when that happens, don't you?


I wouldn't know. Tell me about it.

Pete