"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
m...
"Rob Thomas" wrote in message
.. .
I chose to go with a LLC and deal with the $800 excise tax every year.
It's
really silly that they charge that much for the "opportunity to conduct
business within California." However, the LLC provides me with
protection
and allows me not to have to deal with maintaining two entities for tax
purposes (my LLC is where I make my income BTW). The $800 is also
deductable, so depending on your tax bracket you should recoup $200 or
so.

The California C-Corp has a minimum tax of $800, so any year that it
doesn't
bring in income, you still owe $800. Many folks get burned by that by
not
properlyl shutting down the C-Corp after they are done with it and the
State
merilly charges $800 and fees and penalties. Then someone is shocked to
see
a $5000 bill from the State a few years down the road.

That's what I like about the Mutual Benefit Corp. You're already set
up as non-profit the moment your articles are approved.

Wrong!

As a former president of the board of a nonprofit corporation in
California I am very familiar with the requirements for a nonprofit
corporation. Go to the IRS website and research the requirements for a
federal 501(c)(3) determination before you go any further.
The state of California does NOT determine the nonprofit status of a
corporation. The IRS issues a letter of determination. The Attorney General
and Franchise Tax Board, providing some other requirements are met, rely on
the IRS determination.
Nonprofit status is NOT automatic. There is significant paperwork to
submit for to the feds to establish the status.
The fact that a corporation does not show a profit does NOT make it a
nonprofit corporation.
The fact that a nonprofit corporation increases its net worth year after
year does not invalidate its nonprofit status.