"Greg Copeland" wrote in message
news

"This just in! It seems that even though it doesn't change the story
at all and the plane looks the same, what we previously put forth as
a U-2 is really a TR-1. We realize many of you will have to restart
life from scratch again because of this mistake. We, are, sorry."

You can exercise your privilege to be a smart-ass, if you'd like, but they
are different planes. The TR-1 has equipment pods under the wings and an
elongated nose cone. This isn't quite the same thing as arguing over the
difference between a 737-100 vs a 737-400. The military calls it a TR-1.
The manufacturer calls it a TR-1.

No one really cares in this case unless you are a plane buff...

I thought that was why we were all here. Oh, and plane buffs call it a
TR-1, too.

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________