gatt wrote:
"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message news:40c87dd2$0$90559


Assuming the attribution is correct, it was the source who got it wrong.
On the other hand, the reporter may have misinterpreted his statement.
Either way, don't you think it would be more productive to write to the
site and educate the reporter than just bitch about it?


WELL SAID! THANK YOU!

As are your efforts to preach to the closed-minded. Drop me an email
with a usable return address, will you?