If I'm intoxicated, I
clearly don't meet the requirements for acting as PIC. How could the FAA
possibly accuse me of being at fault in an accident during which I was not
manipulating the controls, and during which I was ineligible to act as PIC?


Wasn't there one where the passenger (a pilot too) was asleep in the back, and
was held to be responsible? I haven't read the original (I suppose it might be
a UL) but after all, I heard it on the internet.

Jose


--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)