View Single Post
  #5  
Old July 18th 04, 08:20 AM
R.L.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Unlike in medical malpractice, most aviation lawsuits are wrongful death
actions involving dead pilots. And guess who sues when a pilot dies: THE
FAMILIES of dead pilots, blaming the manufacturer for their beloved's death.
So if we want aviation economics to improve, we must prohibit our greedy
spouses and children from suing after we screw-up flying our planes.





"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
Okay, we have gone 'round and 'round about why new airplanes cost so much:
low demand, liability, inefficient manufacturing, regulatory requirements,
etc. It is so daunting that Toyota appears to have scrapped its GA

project.

Perhaps one reason demand is so low is because of the cost of becoming a
pilot. It takes most people about a year and $7,000 to learn to fly. Can

you
imagine what would happen to the boating industry if the government

imposed
similar regulatory requirements to learn to drive a boat? Most of getting

a
seaplane license, for example, is really demonstrating boating skills. You
are basically being required to get a very costly license in order to

drive
a kind of boat. What if everyone who drives a boat had to do that? Would
boating be safer? Would it be worth it? Would boating practically die out

as
aviation has?

--
Christopher J. Campbell
World Famous Flight Instructor
Port Orchard, WA


If you go around beating the Bush, don't complain if you rile the animals.