"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


jls wrote:

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


jls wrote:

I have never seen a judgment
awarded to an injured plaintiff when there wasn't some proof of
negligence
or defective design proximately causing the injury.

You haven't been paying attention to the Parker-Hanefin case, I take
it?

George Patterson
None of us is as dumb as all of us.

If I were going to merchandise a mechanical gyro, George, I'd use 2004
technology, not ancient stuff from out of the 50's.

What gyros? Gyros didn't figure in this case.

George Patterson
None of us is as dumb as all of us.

Fair enough on this vaguely relevant point and on the irrelevant point that
the jury verdict was reduced but read the material I provided for Bryan in
another post. I don't claim to be intimately familiar with the facts or
law of the Carnahan lawsuit, just made the so far irrefutable (and
unrefuted) point that a lawsuit doesn't get sent to the jury by a judge who
has not heard and made a note during the lawsuit of credible testimony and
evidence of negligence.