Thread
:
Sport Pilot inconsistency
View Single Post
#
8
September 5th 04, 11:12 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
On 4 Sep 2004 20:58:05 -0700,
(Captain Wubba)
wrote:
The flying that was done did not require a plane weighing more than
1320 lbs. It was VFR day flight with none or one passenger.
It's still a very different kind of flying, if you are in a heavy
plane with a powerful engine, an adjustable-pitch propeller, and
retractable landing gear.
This is precisely the notion that the Recreational Pilot cert was
supposed to address, years ago. I can't fly any of those things (250
hp, constant speed prop, retractable gear), or at night, or (until
Monday) in ATC airspace. My opportunities for getting into mischief
are much less than they would be if I had a Private Pilot cert.
With Sport Pilot rules, one has even fewer opportunities, thus more
latitude in who can fly.
At the same time, the FAA has brought scads of ultra-lighters into the
certification system, presumably making them a bit safer, and making
them susceptible to disciplinary action.
all the best -- Dan Ford
email:
(put Cubdriver in subject line)
The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Expedition sailboat charters
www.expeditionsail.com
Cub Driver