View Single Post
  #53  
Old September 29th 04, 07:01 AM
Scott D.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:49:35 +0000 (UTC),
(Paul Tomblin) wrote:

In a previous article, FullName said:
free speech is constitutionaly protected only when it infriges on my God
given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.


And you don't think 8 policemen with their hands on their guns was
infringing on this guy's right to life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness? He sounded pretty unhappy to me.

Ok Paul, I owe you an apology about the 8 policemen. I didn't realize
that there was more than one page to his rant. After I got to the
third page is where I found his insertion about the second incident.

But my assertion about there is always more than one side to every
story still stands.

Scott D.