"NW_PILOT" wrote in message
...

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...

As far as your question goes, assuming the prescription was legal under
a
State statute or authorized by a State agency (the federal government
still
is prohibiting all use of marijuana as far as I know, even medical use),
I
don't see why it wouldn't be allowed under paragraph (b). Is there some
reason you think it wouldn't be that prompted your question?

Oregon, allows it for medical use. Just wondering what the regs on it was
as
I know someone that has a prescription.


Technically I'd be wary of it as there is a supremacy dispute going on here
as to whether the states can allow medical weed when it is federally
prohibited. You may note that the DEA has busted people in Oregon for
growing pot even though they held a license to do so issued by the state. On
one hand the FAR seems pretty liberl ("any state agency") but OTOH I wonder
whether the state law covers "carriage" or just possession. If it's an
important question you'd really have to consult a FAR lawyer.

In the end, it all comes down to the specific situation and the officials
involved.

-cwk.