"AbsolutelyCertain" wrote in message ...
"Bertie the Bunyip" XZXZ@XZXZ.,XZXZX wrote in message
. 74.13...
"AbsolutelyCertain" wrote in
:


"Nik" wrote in message
...

"AbsolutelyCertain" wrote in message
...

My opinion on the AA587 situation was posted here a long time ago.
If
you
paid as much attention to the details in here as you do to the
study of stop
signs ......you'd know what I said. Let me paraphrase: They ought
to ****ing be able to design and build airplanes that can't be
broken with control inputs at, near, or below maneuvering speed.
If they build an airplane that can't meet that requirement, then
they need to plaster the warnings all over everything and beat the
operators to train
accordingly.

Now that they've "blamed" the pilot for doing what he thought was
an ordinary thing, I hope they feel better. I think it sucks.




I find that you express you opinions with a degree of certainty that
might compete well with the degree of certainty that Billy Graham has
in the Bible...

Really? Show me, please, the "degree of certainty" indices that you
find in the cited blurb, above. Tell me how you calibrated these and
arrived at your conclusion.

The whole thing is framed with the words "my opinion" and "I think",
phrases which you will find at its beginning, and end.

Those are clues that the blurb is in fact nothing more or less than an
opinion. If you disagree with it, feel free to make an argument.

Keep in mind that the blurb is, in context, speech to another poster
in the middle of a prolonged and rather unpleasant feud. Keep in mind
that at the end of the day, that speech, and that feud, are none of
your ****ing business.


Tha's Nikky the nzi, my old buddy, Paul. Try to be nice to him, because,
well, you know.

Okay.

Oops, wrong. Nik, never mind

Bertie