View Single Post
  #26  
Old January 28th 05, 08:05 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

I personally find American xenophobia very tiresome and even
counterproductive.


To characterize illegal entry into the US as 'xenophobia' is to put
your personal spin on the issue.


I prefer to call it 'values.' I value people more than money.

Huge resources are devoted to this 'problem' that could
be better used elsewhere. Suppose we just said that we will let anyone

come
into the country that wants to? Everyone who was just coming in to work

or
pick up a welfare check then would be entering through the legal border
entry points and would stop breaking fences, harassing ranchers, etc.


And in your egalitarian view, how would terrorists be prevented from
mass entry into our country?


They are being stopped now? I am saying that people coming into the country
for legitimate purposes such as work should not be stopped from doing so. A
terrorist would still have to sneak in or come in under false pretenses,
just as they do now.

The
few that would be left crossing illegally would be obvious criminals

engaged
in smuggling, terrorism, and kidnapping.


In the open border scenario you propose, what's to prevent those
immigrants with criminal intent from entering through the "legal
border entry points?"


What stops them now? Pretty much nothing. The only thing we are doing now is
forcing huge numbers of people to become criminals for wanting nothing more
than a job and a decent living. You run the same checks on people at the
border that you do now.


They would therefore be a lot
easier to catch. I think relaxing restrictions on immigration would make
things a lot easier on law enforcement. Our relations with our neighbors
would be greatly improved, also.


My point was that the DHS is harassing the populous without policing
our borders; Ludicrous!

Your view seems quite altruistic, but a little naive to me. Without
some regulation on the VOLUME of immigrants entering the country, it
would soon be awash in hoards of poor people that we citizens would
have to find the means to support. Our social services (schools,
hospitals, jails, ...) would soon be overwhelmed. So your view would
be more plausible if you provided some solutions to the issues open
borders would create.


Immigrants are also taxpayers. They do not stay poor. The only thing that
keeps them poor now is that they must work in the underground economy in
constant fear of being deportation. They are vulnerable to con men, thugs,
and thieves just because they want to work. Many are killed every year. If
we have a welfare problem, it is not because of immigrants. It is a problem
with the idea that it is our responsibility to support everyone who does not
want to work.

It is hysterically funny to have a Democrat accusing a Republican of being
egalitarian or altruistic.