Mark Smith wrote:

Richard Riley wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:49:29 GMT, (sleepy6) wrote:
:
:
:I notice that the Stephenson supporter doesn't have the guts to post
:under his real name. It wouldn't be the first time ole Jim has used a
:false identity for his posts
:
:It doesn't really matter who made the post. The biggest majority of
:the UL community has got wise to Jim now. He can't post on any of the
:most popular lists anymore without several of us asking him embarassing
:questions that he refuses to answer And every time he refuses to
:answer a few more of his ASC toadies lose faith in him.

I didn't post the previous note, but I'll add my support.


As for the things you don't like about it, again, to paraphrase Jim S.:
you fat ul'rs did it to yourselves...

The fat (and fast) UL's did it to themselves.

When Titan Tornado is advertizing as a "legal 103" airplane, and their
2 place is supposed to be a UL trainer, what's the FAA supposed to do?
It's the same with hired guns building ex/am - eventually, if we
really get in their face, they'll come up with a way to enforce the
regs.


I build my own planes to train to save money,plus, get a safer,
stronber, more rigid plane that meets the needs of a rigorous training
routine better.

I can NO LONGER DO THAT !!

Of course you can. Just register it as experimental amateur built.
http://members.eaa.org/home/govt/exemptions/7162.pdf

Richard Riley



You can't train in experimental homebuilt, you knew this I'm sure

Who says you can't? Show me the reg.