View Single Post
  #9  
Old March 17th 05, 04:02 AM
Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Your right it does sound bloodthirsty and maybe I should take another look
at what I had written after I cool down a little.
If they are innocent then I am glad that the judge ruled in their favor.

Now the judge didn't say they where innocent but rather the prosecution was
unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they were guilty.

I am more upset I guess in the fact that all this time and money has been
spent possibly going after the wrong people. Like I said "someone placed a
bomb on those two planes". I guess I feel a little let down in the fact that
our goverment was unable to find the ones responsible and the familys of the
victims have not yet had closure in this case!

Maybe someday the guilty ones will come to trial and be scentenced for this
terrible crime!!

Of course there is the possibility that this will never be solved. Kinda
like the perfect murder isn't it?


"Ben Hallert" wrote in message
oups.com...
Your messages seem to imply that it's obvious that they are guilty. It
might be prudent to wait a little to hear why they were found innocent.
If they didn't do it, then they shouldn't be convicted. I have no
knowledge about whether they did it or not, and I suspect you don't
either.

I'm a bit leary of the bloodthirstiness I read. It might be my
imagination, but it seems to me that I might interpret your message as
saying 'considering the time and money spent, they should have been
convicted because _somebody_ must pay, whether or not they did it.' If
I am in error, I apologize for the insinuation, but that's how I
interpreted it.