wrote in message
ups.com...
Having carefully analyzed my flight requirements and plans for the next
five years or so, I've decided to take the plunge, probably on a
C-172L that I've been looking at. The fixed costs are right about
the amount of what I've been spending renting (actually a little
lower) and I'm about ready to schedule the pre-buy.

I live in Oklahoma so density altitude is noticeable, but not
necessarily a concern

Does anyone have some historical data of their own experiences (both
good and bad) with C-172L's?

Would you consider one as a practical first aircraft for a relatively
new pilot looking to get his instrument ticket and build hours?

Don

Seems like you have analyzed it well. My opinion is that the C172 is an
excellent AC for building hours and instrument training. Docile and slow.
Stable IFR handling. Good 2 place AC up to DA 10,000 ft. Good 4 place AC up
to DA 7-8,000 feet. Can be flown much higher with appropriate precautions.
In my experience the fixed prop resulted in more pilot fatique on long
flights (4+ hours). If it fits your requirements I believe the cost/benefit
ratio of the 172 is better than either the 152 or 182. As you get more
experience, start mountain flying or need to carry 4 adults and baggage
regularly then the move up to a 182 might make sense. The 182 has
significantly higher operating costs than the 172.
Just my opinion
Best of Luck
Howard C182P