"COLIN LAMB" wrote in message
ink.net...
I wish to address the privacy issue. It appears that one or more people
feel that all of the transaction should be considered private and Aircraft
Spruce breached this right of privacy when it disclosed conversations
between a customer and Aircraft Spruce.

There is neither a common law nor a statutory right of privacy regarding
the
conversations mentioned.

How would you know that unless you lived in California and practiced law
there? So I'm assuming you are and you do, and you will make corrections if
I'm wrong?

Be that as it may, Jim Irwin doesn't give a damn about anybody's privacy,
and in my case I don't mind anyway. I did mind that he divulged private
information and addresses of two acquaintances several months ago right here
in RAH, which also led others to comment on his sleaziness.


Divulging the contents of my conversations with his gravel-voiced viragos,
however, does present an issue with common law hearsay, which he uses with
such abandon to prove the content of conversations he could not have even
been a party to. In only one conversation, the first one with the first
virago, did I use vulgar language (a felony for sure!) and not even then
until after a series of insufferable provocations, the first of which was a
razor wire barrier communication system imported from a third world country
like Bangalore or Somalia; the second, being left on hold for almost an
hour, and the third, being interrupted time and time again while I was
trying to explain the reason for delay reporting that the junk Mitchell
Cylinder Head Temperature Gauge was defective right out of the box . If
you are talking to me and I keep cutting you off right in the middle of a
sentence, I can expect you to color and tell me to GFY.

So, in my book, Jim Irwin is a son of a bitch and his customer service is
right out of hell.