Again.. practical "need" is not a "legal requirement". Maybe the lawyer
wanted the business of drawing the lease up or something.. or was
protecting his turf in doing that sort of business.

Dave

Peter wrote:

Dave S wrote


A "dry lease" is a business decision, not a regulatory requirement.


That I can understand. What is bizzare is that I have heard from a
person who says he is a qualified NY lawyer state that the need for a
dry lease comes from some sort of interaction between the FAR
requirements and renting an aircraft outside the USA.


Peter.
--
Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail.
E-mail replies to but remove the X and the Y.
Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary.