View Single Post
  #4  
Old May 23rd 05, 11:02 PM
Darrel Toepfer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:

Experimental Amateur Built has, to an extent, become a simple and
baldfaced dodge around type certification. When 90% of builders are
building a few types of 49% done kits on a cookie cutter basis, it's
time to re-evaluate "the system". Experimental should be for
experimenters: people like Van Grunsven should be told to get a type
certificate, tool up, and build a finished airplane.


I'm all for it if the price stays the same...