And I suspect the ILS DME approaches that may be charted will
eventually be renamed to conform to the para 161.

They are being renamed, but it's in order to conform to ICAO
standards. The FAA apparently doesn't have an issue with the concept
itself.

Your objection to this naming convention, and mine, are not the reason
for the change, if you consider Wally Roberts to be a reliable source.
I'll quote the relevant sections from the thread, when I have more
time.

(BTW, the reference to TERPS is meaningless in this context, because
they're redefining what "necessary" means. So the naming convention
conforms to TERPS.)