Robert M. Gary wrote:
The liberals of the world get
sick when they see someone successful and will want to try to play
Robin Hood.


I'm sorry, but this statement is crap. Not everyone defines "success"
the same way (i.e. the accumulation of great wealth), but even if you
accept that definition most people I know would applaud the guy's
success - to the extent that he earned it.

The question I would ask, though, is what have his heirs done (other
than have better luck choosing their family) that would justify calling
them "successful"?