View Single Post
  #14  
Old June 30th 05, 05:55 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Obviously shooting these a couple of these planes down is impractical. (but
I firmly believe you wouldn't have to kill many before no one would wander
there again)


I daresay no one would fly anywhere near there again, wander or not.

We need to "take care of our own".


No, we need to "take care of the ^(*& regulation". If we turn against
each other we will have played right into our government's hands, which
is in the process of playing into the terrorists hands.

I was at a meeting at DXR Tuesday given by someone whose name escapes me
but is a head of the National Air Transportation Association, who has
been in congress, and who himself is a pilot (along with his wife). He
indicated that the TSA believes that the regulations on little airplanes
are dumb, that those regulations come from the Secret Service, not the
TSA, and that he believes that they will be eventually removed, piece by
piece. Well, I'll believe it when I see it, but it is heartening to
hear it from somebody who should know first hand what is happening.

We as pilots would have to support ["it" - which I presume to
mean more consequences for violators].


I do not feel I would have to support it.

Less incursions is safer for us
(the aviation community)


Less of something you measure. Fewer of something you count.



--
You may not get what you pay for, but you sure as hell pay for what you get.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.